Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AngioPy segmentation: An open-source, user-guided deep learning tool for coronary artery segmentation.
Mahendiran, Thabo; Thanou, Dorina; Senouf, Ortal; Jamaa, Yassine; Fournier, Stephane; De Bruyne, Bernard; Abbé, Emmanuel; Muller, Olivier; Andò, Edward.
Afiliação
  • Mahendiran T; Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Mathematical Data Science, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Thanou D; Mathematical Data Science, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Senouf O; Mathematical Data Science, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Jamaa Y; Center for Imaging, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Fournier S; Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • De Bruyne B; Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Cardiology, OLV Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Abbé E; Mathematical Data Science, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Muller O; Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Andò E; Center for Imaging, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Cardiol ; : 132598, 2024 Sep 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39341506
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) typically employs traditional edge detection algorithms that often require manual correction. This has important implications for the accuracy of downstream 3D coronary reconstructions and computed haemodynamic indices (e.g. angiography-derived fractional flow reserve). We developed AngioPy, a deep-learning model for coronary segmentation that employs user-defined ground-truth points to boost performance and minimise manual correction. We compared its performance without correction with an established QCA system.

METHODS:

Deep learning models integrating user-defined ground-truth points were developed using 2455 images from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) study. External validation was performed on a dataset of 580 images. Vessel dimensions from 203 images with mild/moderate stenoses segmented by AngioPy (without correction) and an established QCA system (Medis QFR®) were compared (609 diameters).

RESULTS:

The top-performing model had an average F1 score of 0.927 (pixel accuracy 0.998, precision 0.925, sensitivity 0.930, specificity 0.999) with 99.2 % of masks exhibiting an F1 score > 0.8. Similar results were seen with external validation (F1 score 0.924, pixel accuracy 0.997, precision 0.921, sensitivity 0.929, specificity 0.999). Vessel dimensions from AngioPy exhibited excellent agreement with QCA (r = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.95-0.96], p < 0.001; mean difference - 0.18 mm [limits of agreement (LOA) -0.84 to 0.49]), including the minimal luminal diameter (r = 0.93 [95 % CI 0.91-0.95], p < 0.001; mean difference - 0.06 mm [LOA -0.70 to 0.59]).

CONCLUSION:

AngioPy, an open-source tool, performs rapid and accurate coronary segmentation without the need for manual correction. It has the potential to increase the accuracy and efficiency of QCA.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol / Int. j. cardiol / International journal of cardiology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol / Int. j. cardiol / International journal of cardiology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça País de publicação: Holanda