Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Biomechanical Analysis of Oblique Metacarpal Metadiaphyseal Fracture Fixation in a Cadaver Model.
Garcia-Lopez, Edgar; Siu, Jeremy Wafong; Kwong, Jeffrey W; Kamal, Robin N; Schroeder, Nicole; Shapiro, Lauren M.
Afiliação
  • Garcia-Lopez E; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: edgar.garcia-lopez@ucsf.edu.
  • Siu JW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • Kwong JW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • Kamal RN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
  • Schroeder N; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
  • Shapiro LM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
J Hand Surg Am ; 2024 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39352346
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although metacarpal fractures are typically managed nonoperatively, when surgical management is indicated, metacarpal fractures are commonly treated with crossed Kirschner wires (K-wires), which may limit early range of motion. Intramedullary implants are increasing in use with the potential advantage of early range of motion; however, stability in oblique metacarpal neck fractures remains a theoretical concern. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical stability of noncompressive intramedullary fixation for oblique metacarpal neck fractures compared with crossed K-wire fixation.

METHODS:

The index, long, and small metacarpals were harvested from three matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadavers. Oblique fractures at the metadiaphyseal region were created in each metacarpal. Each metacarpal was randomized to noncompressive, threaded intramedullary nail fixation or fixation with two crossed K-wires. Specimens were mounted in a Materials Testing System load frame and axially loaded until failure. Load to failure (LTF), stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement were calculated from load-displacement curves. Differences in peak LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement between noncompressive intramedullary fixation and crossed K-wire fixation were evaluated.

RESULTS:

The noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort had a significantly higher LTF (1,190.9 ± 534.7 N vs 297.0 ± 156.0 N) and stiffness (551.3 ± 164.6 N/mm vs 283.0 ± 194.5 N/mm) when compared with the crossed K-wire fixation cohort. Load at 2 mm displacement was greater in the noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort compared with crossed K-wire fixation (820.5 ± 203.9 vs 514.1 ± 259.6).

CONCLUSIONS:

For oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures, noncompressive intramedullary fixation provides a biomechanically superior construct under axial loading in terms of LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with crossed K-wire fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Noncompressive intramedullary nails may be an alternative to K-wire fixation for the treatment of oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos