Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Design and implementation of a stakeholder consultation process for rapid health technology assessments in Argentina.
Alcaraz, Andrea; Navarro, Emiliano; Alfie, Verónica; Perelli, Lucas; García Martí, Sebastián; Ciapponi, Agustín; Bardach, Ariel; Pichon-Riviere, Andrés; Augustovski, Federico.
Afiliação
  • Alcaraz A; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: aalcaraz@iecs.org.ar.
  • Navarro E; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Alfie V; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Perelli L; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • García Martí S; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Ciapponi A; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bardach A; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Pichon-Riviere A; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Augustovski F; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arch Med Res ; 56(1): 103093, 2024 Oct 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39369667
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Health technology assessment (HTA) is a standardized methodology that allows the assessment technologies' value. By incorporating the perspective of stakeholders in a public consultation process, transparency and quality of decisions can be improved.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the active stakeholder consultation process for rapid HTAs in an Argentinean, independent, academic, non-profit HTA agency, assessing its initial five years.

METHODS:

Since 2017, we have been conducting an active public consultation process for rapid HTA documents, inviting producers, healthcare professionals, and patient organizations to provide comments, and their input may lead to changes in the HTA documents. Changes were classified as major (changes to the coverage recommendation), intermediate (changes in efficacy, net benefit, or cost-effectiveness that did not change coverage recommendations), and minor modifications (other changes).

RESULTS:

From May 2017-August 2022, 308 rapid HTA (rHTA) reports were published, and 3,438 invitations were sent. 140 rHTA (45.5%) received a total of 228 comments. Comments came from producers in 53% (n = 112) and healthcare professional organizations in 31.2% (n = 66). Technologies evaluated were drugs in 37% (n = 114), procedures in 35.5% (n = 109), diagnostic methods in 15.3% (n = 47), and devices in 12.2% (n = 38). Out of 308 rHTA documents, 120 (39%) were modified-mostly minor adjustments (n = 100; 80%), followed by major (n = 12; 10%) and intermediate modifications (n = 8; 6.4%).

CONCLUSION:

Implementing an active stakeholder involvement process in HTA is feasible in a low- to middle-income country context and strengthens and improves the HTA process.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: Arch Med Res / Arch. med. res / Archives of medical research Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: Arch Med Res / Arch. med. res / Archives of medical research Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos