Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anal sphincter function in rectal intussusception and high and low "take-off" external rectal prolapse-A prospective observational study.
O'Connor, Alexander; Byrne, Caroline M; Heywood, Nick; Davenport, Matthew; Klarskov, Niels; Sharma, Abhiram; Kiff, Edward; Telford, Karen.
Afiliação
  • O'Connor A; Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Byrne CM; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Heywood N; Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Davenport M; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Klarskov N; Department of Colorectal Surgery, East Lancashire NHS Hospitals Trust, Blackburn, UK.
  • Sharma A; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Kiff E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Telford K; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Colorectal Dis ; 2024 Oct 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39370561
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Rectal intussusception (RI) and external rectal prolapse (ERP) are associated with anal sphincter dysfunction. The aim of this study was to examine sphincter function with anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) in RI and two distinct phenotypes of ERP termed high and low "take-off".

METHODS:

A prospective study of patients with RI and ERP attending a tertiary pelvic floor unit. Clinical data, AAR, and conventional anal manometry were analysed according to the Oxford prolapse grade.

RESULTS:

A total of 108 (102 [94%] female, median age 62 years [range 26-95]) patients were recruited into three groups according to prolapse grade Oxford grades I and II (intrarectal RI, n = 34), Oxford grades III and IV (intra-anal RI, n = 35) and Oxford grade V (ERP, n = 39). As the grade of prolapse increased, resting AAR measurements of opening pressure, opening elastance, closing pressure, and closing elastance decreased (p < 0.001). Maximum resting pressure with manometry was reduced in ERP and intra-anal RI compared to intrarectal RI (p < 0.001). However, incremental squeeze function was not different between the three groups with either AAR or manometry (p > 0.05). There were no differences in AAR or manometry variables between grade IV RI (n = 18) and high take-off ERP (n = 20) (p > 0.05). By contrast, opening pressure (p = 0.010), closing pressure (p = 0.019) and elastance (p = 0.022) were reduced in low take-off ERP (n = 19).

CONCLUSION:

Increasing rectal prolapse grade is associated with reduced anal sphincter function at rest indicating internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Physiological differences exist between high and low take-off ERP with sphincter function in the former similar to that seen in grade IV RI.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis / Colorectal dis / Colorectal disease Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis / Colorectal dis / Colorectal disease Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido