Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How can patients shape digital medicine? A rapid review of patient and public involvement and engagement in the development of digital health technologies for neurological conditions.
Hanrahan, Megan; Wilson, Cameron; Keogh, Alison; Barker, Sandra; Rochester, Lynn; Brittain, Katie; Lumsdon, Jack; McArdle, Ríona.
Afiliação
  • Hanrahan M; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
  • Wilson C; School of Clinical Medicine, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Keogh A; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Barker S; Public Patient Advisory Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
  • Rochester L; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
  • Brittain K; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
  • Lumsdon J; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
  • McArdle R; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39376020
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) involves working 'with' or 'by' patients and the public, rather than 'to,' 'about,' or 'for' them, and is integral to neurological and digital health research. This rapid review examined PPIE integration in the development and implementation of digital health technologies for neurological conditions.

METHODS:

Key terms were input into six databases. Included articles were qualitative studies or PPIE activities involving patient perspectives in shaping digital health technologies for neurological conditions. Bias was evaluated using the NICE qualitative checklist, with reporting following PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS:

2,140 articles were identified, with 28 included. Of these, 25 were qualitative studies, and only three were focused PPIE activities. Patient involvement was mostly limited to one-off consultations during development.There was little evidence of PPIE during implementation, and minimal reporting on its impact.

CONCLUSIONS:

PPIE has been inconsistently reported in this research area, highlighting the need for more guidance and best-practice examples This review used a UK-based definition of PPIE, which may have excluded relevant activities from other countries. Future reviews should broaden terminology to capture PPIE integration globally.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res / Expert rev. pharmacoecon. outcomes res / Expert review of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res / Expert rev. pharmacoecon. outcomes res / Expert review of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido