Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient preferences for conservative treatment of shoulder pain: a discrete choice experiment.
Versloot, Annelotte H C; Veldwijk, Jorien; Ottenheijm, Ramon P G; de Graaf, Marloes; van der Windt, Daniëlle A; Koes, Bart W; Runhaar, Jos; Schiphof, Dieuwke.
Afiliação
  • Versloot AHC; Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Veldwijk J; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ottenheijm RPG; Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • de Graaf M; Fysio-Experts, Rijndijk 137, 2394 AG Hazerswoude Rijndijk, The Netherlands.
  • van der Windt DA; School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
  • Koes BW; Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Runhaar J; Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health and Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense, Denmark.
  • Schiphof D; Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract ; 2024 Oct 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39388636
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Shoulder pain is common amongst adults, but little is known about patients' preferences.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to determine patients' preferences for treatment options offered for shoulder pain in primary care.

METHODS:

A discrete choice experiment was used to investigate these preferences. Adults with shoulder pain were asked to make 12 choices between two treatment options, or to opt-out. The attributes of the 12 treatment options were presented as varying in treatment effectiveness (50%, 70%, or 90%), risk of relapse (10%, 20%, or 30%), time to pain reduction (2 or 6 weeks), prevention of relapse (yes/no), requiring injection (yes/no), and including physiotherapy (none, 6, or 12 sessions). A conditional logit model with latent class analysis was used for the analysis and a class assignment model.

RESULTS:

Three hundred and twelve participants completed the questionnaire with mean age of 52 ±â€…15.2 years. Latent class analysis revealed three groups. Group 1 preferred to opt-out, unless the attributes were highly favorable (90% effectiveness). Group 2 preferred treatment, but not an injection. Group 3 preferred to opt-out and did not opt for treatment. The likelihood of a participant belonging to one of these groups was 68.8%, 9.3%, and 21.9%, respectively. The class assignment was related to having previously received injection or physiotherapy, as they did not prefer that same treatment again.

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that most patients with shoulder pain prefer to opt-out, unless treatment attributes are highly favorable. Characteristics of influence on this decision was whether the patient had received an injection or physiotherapy before.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Fam Pract / Fam. pract / Family Practice Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Fam Pract / Fam. pract / Family Practice Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Reino Unido