Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
You are How You Eat: Foraging Behavior as a Potential Novel Marker of Rat Affective State.
Neville, Vikki; Finnegan, Emily; Paul, Elizabeth S; Davidson, Molly; Dayan, Peter; Mendl, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Neville V; Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
  • Finnegan E; Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
  • Paul ES; Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
  • Davidson M; Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
  • Dayan P; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics & University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Mendl M; Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
Affect Sci ; 5(3): 232-245, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39391344
ABSTRACT
Effective and safe foraging requires animals to behave according to the expectations they have about the rewards, threats, and costs in their environment. Since these factors are thought to be reflected in the animals' affective states, we can use foraging behavior as a window into those states. In this study, rats completed a foraging task in which they had repeatedly to decide whether to continue to harvest a food source despite increasing time costs, or to forgo food to switch to a different food source. Rats completed this task across two experiments using manipulations designed to induce both positive and negative, and shorter- and longer- term changes in affective state removal and return of enrichment (Experiment 1), implementation and reversal of an unpredictable housing treatment (Experiment 1), and delivery of rewards (tickling or sucrose) and punishers (air-puff or back-handling) immediately prior to testing (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, rats completed fewer trials and were more prone to switching between troughs when housed in standard, compared to enriched, housing conditions. In Experiment 2, rats completed more trials following pre-test tickling compared to pre-test sucrose delivery. However, we also found that they were prone to disengaging from the task, suggesting they were really choosing between three options 'harvest', 'switch', or 'not work'. This limits the straightforward interpretation of the results. At present, foraging behavior within the context of this task cannot reliably be used as an indicator of an affective state in animals. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-024-00242-4.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Affect Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Affect Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Suíça