Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining ideal middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm size for Woven EndoBridge embolization.
Adeeb, Nimer; Musmar, Basel; Salim, Hamza Adel; Aslan, Assala; Alla, Anika; Cancelliere, Nicole M; McLellan, Rachel M; Algin, Oktay; Ghozy, Sherief; Dibas, Mahmoud; Lay, Sovann V; Guenego, Adrien; Renieri, Leonardo; Carnevale, Joseph; Saliou, Guillaume; Mastorakos, Panagiotis; Naamani, Kareem El; Shotar, Eimad; Premat, Kevin; Möhlenbruch, Markus; Kral, Michael; Doron, Omer; Chung, Charlotte; Salem, Mohamed M; Lylyk, Ivan; Foreman, Paul M; Vachhani, Jay A; Shaikh, Hamza; Zupancic, Vedran; Hafeez, Muhammad U; Catapano, Joshua S; Waqas, Muhammad; Tutino, Vincent M; Ibrahim, Mohamed K; Mohammed, Marwa A; Ozates, M Ozgur; Ayberk, Giyas; Rabinov, James D; Ren, Yifan; Schirmer, Clemens M; Piano, Mariangela; Kühn, Anna L; Michelozzi, Caterina; Elens, Stéphanie; Starke, Robert M; Hassan, Ameer; Ogilvie, Mark; Nguyen, Anh; Jones, Jesse; Brinjikji, Waleed.
Afiliação
  • Adeeb N; 1Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Musmar B; 1Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Salim HA; 1Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Aslan A; 1Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Alla A; 1Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Cancelliere NM; 2Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • McLellan RM; 3Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Algin O; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ghozy S; 5Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Dibas M; 1Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Lay SV; 6Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Toulouse Hospital Center, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France.
  • Guenego A; 7Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Renieri L; 8Neurovascular Interventional Neuroradiology, Careggi Hospital of Florence, Italy.
  • Carnevale J; 9Neurosurgery & Interventional Neuroradiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Saliou G; 10Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Vaudois Hospital Center of Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Mastorakos P; 11Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Naamani KE; 11Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Shotar E; 12Department of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • Premat K; 12Department of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • Möhlenbruch M; 13Section of Vascular and Interventional Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kral M; 14Department of Neurosurgery, Christian Doppler University Hospital & Institute of Neurointervention, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Doron O; 3Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Chung C; 15Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health Center, New York, New York.
  • Salem MM; 16Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lylyk I; 17Endovascular Neurosurgery and Interventional Radiology Team, La Sagrada Familia Clinic, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Foreman PM; 18Department of Neurosurgery, Orlando Health Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Institute, Orlando, Florida.
  • Vachhani JA; 18Department of Neurosurgery, Orlando Health Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Institute, Orlando, Florida.
  • Shaikh H; 19Department of Radiology & Neurosurgery, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Zupancic V; 20Department of Radiology, Subdivision of Interventional Neuroradiology, Clinical Hospital Center "Sisters of Mercy," Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Hafeez MU; 21Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch and Baylor School of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  • Catapano JS; 22Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Waqas M; 23Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York.
  • Tutino VM; 23Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York.
  • Ibrahim MK; 5Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Mohammed MA; 5Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Ozates MO; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ayberk G; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Rabinov JD; 3Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Ren Y; 24Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology, and Neurointerventional Services, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Schirmer CM; 25Department of Neurosurgery and Radiology, Geisinger Hospital, Danville, Pennsylvania.
  • Piano M; 26Interventistica Neurovascolare, Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda, Milano, Italy.
  • Kühn AL; 27Department of Neurointerventional Radiology, UMass Memorial Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Michelozzi C; 28Neurovascular Interventional Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Interventistica Neurovascolare, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
  • Elens S; 8Neurovascular Interventional Neuroradiology, Careggi Hospital of Florence, Italy.
  • Starke RM; 29Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Florida.
  • Hassan A; 30Department of Neuroscience, Valley Baptist Neuroscience Institute, Harlingen, Texas.
  • Ogilvie M; 31Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Nguyen A; 32Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland.
  • Jones J; 31Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Brinjikji W; 5Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-11, 2024 Oct 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39393093
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was approved to treat wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The device is designed as an intrasaccular flow disruptor covering aneurysm widths up to 10 mm. Although prior studies combined all aneurysm sizes, it is known that aneurysms behave differently in response to endovascular treatment based on their size. Therefore, the authors' objective was to identify ideal middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm width and neck sizes most suitable for WEB treatment.

METHODS:

The WorldWideWEB consortium is a large multicenter retrospective database that analyzes intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. In this study, all unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms with available measurements were included. Cutoff values based on aneurysm width and neck in relation to aneurysm occlusion status were measured using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then used to compare treatment outcomes between aneurysms smaller and larger than the cutoff value for both width and neck size.

RESULTS:

The ideal cutoff values for MCA bifurcation aneurysm width and neck were 6.1 mm and 4.6 mm, respectively. On PSM, 87 matched pairs were compared based on width size (≤ 6.1 mm and > 6.1 mm), and 77 matched pairs were compared based on neck size (≤ 4.6 mm and > 4.6 mm). There was a significant difference in adequate aneurysm occlusion between aneurysms smaller and larger than those cutoff values for both widths (93% vs 76%, p = 0.0017) and neck sizes (90% vs 70%, p = 0.0026). The retreatment rate was also significantly higher for larger aneurysms in both parameters.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study shows that MCA bifurcation aneurysms ≤ 6.1 mm in width and ≤ 4.6 mm in neck size are significantly better candidates for WEB treatment, leading to improved occlusion status and reduced retreatment rate, which are important considerations when using WEB devices.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg / J. neurosurg / Journal of neurosurgery Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg / J. neurosurg / Journal of neurosurgery Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos