Predictive value of letters of recommendation vs questionnaires for emergency medicine resident performance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of standard letters of recommendation (LORs) vs preprinted questionnaires (PPQs) for resident performance at one emergency medicine (EM) residency program. METHODS: A retrospective association of LORs and PPQs with in-training residents performance ratings was done at one EM residency program. The residency application files of EM residents who completed the program were reviewed to locate files that had LORs and PPQs written by the same author. Seventeen resident files contained 32 LOR/PPQ pairs. These LORs and PPQs were submitted in a blinded fashion to 3 outside EM residency directors. Each LOR and PPQ was evaluated for the applicant's suitability for the specialty of EM, medical knowledge, procedural skills, interpersonal skills, motivation, and overall rank. The scores given by the outside reviewers were compared with resident performance ratings determined by 5 EM attending physicians who evaluated the residents along the same 6 dimensional ratings. RESULTS: Statistically, no differences were found between the LORs and PPQs in predicting resident performance. CONCLUSIONS: PPQs may substitute for LORs in the evaluation of resident applicants.