Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Macaque-human differences in SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibody response elicited by vaccination or infection
Alexandra Willcox; Kevin Sung; Meghan E. Garrett; Jared G. Galloway; Megan A. O’Connor; Jesse H. Erasmus; Jennifer K. Logue; David W. Hawman; Helen Y. Chu; Kim J. Hasenkrug; Deborah H. Fuller; Frederick A. Matsen; Julie Overbaugh.
Afiliação
  • Alexandra Willcox; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Kevin Sung; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Meghan E. Garrett; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Jared G. Galloway; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Megan A. O’Connor; University of Washington
  • Jesse H. Erasmus; University of Washington
  • Jennifer K. Logue; University of Washington
  • David W. Hawman; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Intramural Research
  • Helen Y. Chu; University of Washington
  • Kim J. Hasenkrug; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Intramural Research
  • Deborah H. Fuller; University of Washington
  • Frederick A. Matsen; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Julie Overbaugh; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Preprint em En | PREPRINT-BIORXIV | ID: ppbiorxiv-470697
ABSTRACT
Macaques are a commonly used model for studying immunity to human viruses, including for studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. However, it is unknown whether macaque antibody responses recapitulate, and thus appropriately model, the response in humans. To answer this question, we employed a phage-based deep mutational scanning approach (Phage- DMS) to compare which linear epitopes are targeted on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in humans and macaques following either vaccination or infection. We also used Phage-DMS to determine antibody escape pathways within each epitope, enabling a granular comparison of antibody binding specificities at the locus level. Overall, we identified some common epitope targets in both macaques and humans, including in the fusion peptide (FP) and stem helix- heptad repeat 2 (SH-H) regions. Differences between groups included a response to epitopes in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) in vaccinated humans but not vaccinated macaques, as well as recognition of a CTD epitope and epitopes flanking the FP in convalescent macaques but not convalescent humans. There was also considerable variability in the escape pathways among individuals within each group. Sera from convalescent macaques showed the least variability in escape overall and converged on a common response with vaccinated humans in the SH-H epitope region, suggesting highly similar antibodies were elicited. Collectively, these findings suggest that the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in macaques shares many features with humans, but with substantial differences in the recognition of certain epitopes and considerable individual variability in antibody escape profiles, suggesting a diverse repertoire of antibodies that can respond to major epitopes in both humans and macaques. Author summaryNon-human primates, including macaques, are considered the best animal model for studying infectious diseases that infect humans. Vaccine candidates for SARS-CoV-2 are first tested in macaques to assess immune responses prior to advancing to human trials, and macaques are also used to model the human immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, there may be differences in how macaque and human antibodies recognize the SARS-CoV-2 entry protein, Spike. Here we characterized the locations on Spike that are recognized by antibodies from vaccinated or infected macaques and humans. We also made mutations to the viral sequence and assessed how these affected antibody binding, enabling a comparison of antibody binding requirements between macaques and humans at a very precise level. We found that macaques and humans share some responses, but also recognize distinct regions of Spike. We also found that in general, antibodies from different individuals had unique responses to viral mutations, regardless of species. These results will yield a better understanding of how macaque data can be used to inform human immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
Licença
cc0
Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 09-preprints Base de dados: PREPRINT-BIORXIV Tipo de estudo: Experimental_studies / Rct Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 09-preprints Base de dados: PREPRINT-BIORXIV Tipo de estudo: Experimental_studies / Rct Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint