Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
COVID-19 length of hospital stay: a systematic review and data synthesis
Eleanor M Rees; Emily S Nightingale; Yalda Jafari; Naomi Waterlow; Samuel Clifford; Carl A B Pearson; CMMID Working Group; Thibaut Jombert; Simon R Procter; Gwenan M Knight.
Afiliação
  • Eleanor M Rees; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Emily S Nightingale; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Yalda Jafari; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Naomi Waterlow; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Samuel Clifford; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Carl A B Pearson; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • CMMID Working Group;
  • Thibaut Jombert; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Simon R Procter; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Gwenan M Knight; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20084780
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented strain on health systems, with rapidly increasing demand for healthcare in hospitals and intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. As the pandemic escalates, determining the resulting needs for healthcare resources (beds, staff, equipment) has become a key priority for many countries. Projecting future demand requires estimates of how long patients with COVID-19 need different levels of hospital care. MethodsWe performed a systematic review to gather data on length of stay (LoS) of patients with COVID-19 in hospital and in ICU. We subsequently developed a method to generate LoS distributions which combines summary statistics reported in multiple studies, accounting for differences in sample sizes. Applying this approach we provide distributions for general hospital and ICU LoS from studies in China and elsewhere, for use by the community. ResultsWe identified 52 studies, the majority from China (46/52). Median hospital LoS ranged from 4 to 53 days within China, and 4 to 21 days outside of China, across 45 studies. ICU LoS was reported by eight studies - four each within and outside China - with median values ranging from 6 to 12 and 4 to 19 days, respectively. Our summary distributions have a median hospital LoS of 14 (IQR 10-19) days for China, compared with 5 (IQR 3-9) days outside of China. For ICU, the summary distributions are more similar (median (IQR) of 8 (5-13) days for China and 7 (4-11) days outside of China). There was a visible difference by discharge status, with patients who were discharged alive having longer LoS than those who died during their admission, but no trend associated with study date. ConclusionPatients with COVID-19 in China appeared to remain in hospital for longer than elsewhere. This may be explained by differences in criteria for admission and discharge between countries, and different timing within the pandemic. In the absence of local data, the combined summary LoS distributions provided here can be used to model bed demands for contingency planning and then updated, with the novel method presented here, as more studies with aggregated statistics emerge outside China.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Review / Revisão sistemática Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Review / Revisão sistemática Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...