Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Missing clinical trial data: the knowledge gap in the safety of potential COVID-19 drugs
Florence Rodgers; Toby Pepperrell; Sarai Keestra; Victoria Pilkington.
Afiliação
  • Florence Rodgers; School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Toby Pepperrell; School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Sarai Keestra; 1. School of Anthropology & Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, UK 2. Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical M
  • Victoria Pilkington; Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare Trust
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20117523
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BackgroundSeveral drugs are being repurposed for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic based on in vitro or early clinical findings. As these drugs are being used in varied regimens and dosages, it is important to enable synthesis of existing safety data from clinical trials. However, availability of safety information is limited by a lack of timely reporting of clinical trial results on public registries or through academic publication. We aimed to analyse the evidence gap in safety data by quantifying the number of missing clinical trial results for drugs potentially being repurposed for COVID-19 by conducting a rapid review of results posting on ClinicalTrials.gov and in academic publications. MethodsClinicalTrials.gov was searched for 19 drugs that have been identified as potential treatments for COVID-19. Relevant clinical trials for any prior indication were listed by identifier (NCT number) and checked for results and for timely result reporting (within 395 days of the primary completion date). Additionally, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify publications of results not listed on the registry. A second, blinded search of 10% of trials was conducted to assess reviewer concordance. ResultsOf 3754 completed trials, 1516 (40.4%) did not post results on ClinicalTrials.gov or in the academic literature. 1172 (31.2%) completed trials had tabular results on ClinicalTrials.gov. A further 1066 (28.4%) completed trials had results from the literature search, but did not report results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Key drugs missing clinical trial results include hydroxychloroquine (37.0% completed trials unreported), favipiravir (77.8%) and lopinavir (40.5%). ConclusionsThere is an important evidence gap for the safety of drugs being repurposed for COVID-19. This uncertainty could cause a large burden of additional morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. We recommend caution in experimental drug use for non-severe disease and urge clinical trial sponsors to report missing results retrospectively.
Licença
cc_by
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo prognóstico / Rct / Review Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo prognóstico / Rct / Review Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...