Este artigo é um Preprint
Preprints são relatos preliminares de pesquisa que não foram certificados pela revisão por pares. Eles não devem ser considerados para orientar a prática clínica ou comportamentos relacionados à saúde e não devem ser publicados na mídia como informação estabelecida.
Preprints publicados online permitem que os autores recebam feedback rápido, e toda a comunidade científica pode avaliar o trabalho independentemente e responder adequadamente. Estes comentários são publicados juntamente com os preprints para qualquer pessoa ler e servir como uma avaliação pós-publicação.
Decontamination of N95 masks against coronavirus: a scoping review
Preprint
em Inglês
| medRxiv
| ID: ppmedrxiv-20151399
ABSTRACT
BackgroundAt present, it remains uncertain which method to decontaminate N95 is most suitable and should be recommended to healthcare professionals worldwide. ObjectivesThe aim of this scoping review was to map and compile the available evidence about the effectiveness of decontaminating N95 masks against coronavirus. MethodsWe selected studies written in English assessing or discussing decontamination strategies of N95 masks against coronavirus. The search and study screening were performed in PubMed and SCOPUS by two independent researchers. A descriptive analysis was performed considering the study design of included studies. ResultsWe included nineteen studies. Eight articles were letter to the editors, five were in vitro studies, three were literature reviews, and three were classified as other study designs. The use of vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation were the strategies most cited. However, there is a lack of evidence and consensus related to the best method of N95 masks decontamination. ConclusionThe evidence towards decontamination strategies of N95 masks against coronavirus remains scarce. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation seem the current standard for N95 masks decontamination.
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo:
Disponível
Coleções:
Preprints
Base de dados:
medRxiv
Tipo de estudo:
Review
Idioma:
Inglês
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Preprint