Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Seroprevalence of Hospital Staff in Province with Zero COVID-19 cases
Tanawin Nopsopon; Krit Pongpirul; Korn Chotirosniramit; Wutichai Jakaew; Chuenkhwan Kaewwijit; Sawan Kanchana; Narin Hiransuthikul.
Afiliação
  • Tanawin Nopsopon; Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine
  • Krit Pongpirul; Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine
  • Korn Chotirosniramit; Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine
  • Wutichai Jakaew; Ranong Hospital
  • Chuenkhwan Kaewwijit; Ranong Hospital
  • Sawan Kanchana; Ranong Hospital
  • Narin Hiransuthikul; Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20151944
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 seroprevalence data has been scarce, especially in less developed countries with a relatively low infection rate. METHODSA locally developed rapid immunoglobulin M (IgM) / immunoglobulin G (IgG) test kit was used for screening hospital staff in Ranong hospital which located in a province with zero COVID-19 prevalence in Thailand from April 17 to May 17, 2020. A total of 844 participants were tested; 82 of which were tested twice with one month apart. (Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20200426002) RESULTSOverall, 0.8% of the participants (7 of 844) had positive IgM, none had positive IgG. Female staff seemed to have higher IgM seropositive than male staff (1.0% vs. 0.5%). None of the participants with a history of travel to the high-risk area or a history of close contact with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 case had developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Among 844 staff, 811 had no symptom and six of them developed IgM seropositive (0.7%) while 33 had minor symptoms and only one of them developed IgM seropositive (3.0%). No association between IgM antibody against SARS-CoV-2 status and gender, history of travel to a high-risk area, history of close contact with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 case, history of close contact with suspected COVID-19 case, presence of symptoms within 14 days, or previous PCR status was found. None of the hospital staff developed IgG against SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONCOVID-19 antibody test could detect a substantial number of hospital staffs who could be potential silent spreaders in a province with zero COVID-19 cases. Antibody testing should be encouraged for mass screening, especially in asymptomatic healthcare workers. TRIAL REGISTRATIONThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chulalongkorn University (IRB No.236/63) and the Institutional Review Board of Ranong Hospital. (Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20200426002) FUNDINGNone.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...