Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in the view of large-scale testing
Pavel Drevinek; Jakub Hurych; Zdenek Kepka; Ales Briksi; Michal Kulich; Miroslav Zajac; Petr Hubacek.
Afiliação
  • Pavel Drevinek; 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital
  • Jakub Hurych; 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital
  • Zdenek Kepka; Motol University Hospital
  • Ales Briksi; Motol University Hospital
  • Michal Kulich; Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University
  • Miroslav Zajac; Motol University Hospital
  • Petr Hubacek; 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20237198
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesAntigen tests have recently emerged as an interesting alternative to SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic PCR, thought to be valuable especially for the screening of bigger communities. To check appropriateness of the antigen based testing, we determined sensitivity of two point-of-care antigen tests when applied to a cohort of COVID-19 symptomatic, COVID-19 asymptomatic and healthy persons. MethodsWe examined nasopharyngeal swabs with antigen test 1 (Panbio Covid-19 Ag Rapid Test, Abbott) and antigen test 2 (Standard F Covid-19 Ag FIA, SD Biosensor). An additional nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab of the same individual was checked with PCR (Allplex SARS-nCoV-2, Seegene). Within a 4-day period in October 2020, we collected specimens from 591 subjects. Of them, 290 had COVID-19 associated symptoms. ResultsWhile PCR positivity was detected in 223 cases, antigen test 1 and antigen test 2 were found positive in 148 (sensitivity 0.664, 95% CI 0.599 - 0.722) and 141 (sensitivity 0.623, 95% CI 0.558 - 0.684) patients, respectively. When only symptomatic patients were analysed, sensitivity increased to 0.738 (95% CI 0.667 - 0.799) for the antigen test 1 and to 0.685 (95% CI 0.611 - 0.750) for the antigen test 2. The substantial drop in sensitivity to 12.9% (95% CI 0.067 - 0.234) was observed for samples with the PCR threshold cycle above > 30. ConclusionsLow sensitivity of antigen tests leads to the considerable risk of false negativity. It is advisable to implement repeated testing with high enough frequency if the antigen test is used as a frontline screening tool.
Licença
cc_no
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...