Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of PanbioTM rapid antigen tests on oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2
Marie-Therese Ngo Nsoga; Ilona Kronig; Francisco Javier Perez Rodriguez; Pascale Sattonnet-Roche; Diogo Da Silva; Javan Helbling; Jilian A Sacks; Margaretha de Vos; Erik Boehm; Angèle Gayet- Ageron; Alice Berger; Frédérique Jacquerioz-Bausch; François Chappuis; Laurent Kaiser; Manuel Schibler; Adriana Renzoni; Isabella Eckerle.
Afiliação
  • Marie-Therese Ngo Nsoga; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Ilona Kronig; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Francisco Javier Perez Rodriguez; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Pascale Sattonnet-Roche; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Diogo Da Silva; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Javan Helbling; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Jilian A Sacks; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
  • Margaretha de Vos; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
  • Erik Boehm; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Angèle Gayet- Ageron; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Alice Berger; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Frédérique Jacquerioz-Bausch; Geneva University Hospitals
  • François Chappuis; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Laurent Kaiser; University of Geneva Hospitals
  • Manuel Schibler; University of Geneva Hospitals
  • Adriana Renzoni; Geneva University Hospitals
  • Isabella Eckerle; University Hospitals of Geneva
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21250314
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BackgroundAntigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 offer new opportunities for testing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) are the reference sample type, but oropharyngeal swabs (OPS) may be a more acceptable sample type in some patients. MethodsWe conducted a prospective study in a single screening center to assess the diagnostic performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott) on OPS compared with reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using NPS. Results402 outpatients were enrolled in a COVID-19 screening center, of whom 168 (41.8%) had a positive RT-qPCR test. The oropharyngeal Ag-RDT sensitivity compared to nasopharyngeal RT-qPCR was 81% (95%CI 74.2-86.6). Two false positives were noted out of the 234 RT-qPCR negative individuals, which resulted in a specificity of 99.1% (95%CI 96.9-99.9) for the Ag-RDT. For cycle threshold values [≤] 26.7 ([≥] 1E6 SARS-CoV-2 genomes copies/mL, a presumed cut-off for infectious virus), 96.3% sensitivity (95%CI 90.7-99.0%) was obtained with the Ag-RDT using OPS. InterpretationBased on our findings, the diagnostic performance of the Panbio Covid-19 RDT with OPS samples meet the criteria required by the WHO for Ag-RDTs (sensitivity[≥]80% and specificity [≥]97%).
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...