Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay
Elena Riester; Peter Findeisen; J. Kolja Hegel; Michael Kabesch; Andreas Ambrosch; Christopher M Rank; Florina Langen; Tina Laengin; Christoph Niederhauser.
Afiliação
  • Elena Riester; Labor Augsburg MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany
  • Peter Findeisen; MVZ Labor Limbach, Heidelberg, Germany
  • J. Kolja Hegel; Labor Berlin, Charite Vivantes Services GmbH, Berlin, Germany
  • Michael Kabesch; University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO) at the Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John and the University Hospital, University of Regensburg, Germ
  • Andreas Ambrosch; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology and Hygiene, Barmherzige Bruder Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
  • Christopher M Rank; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Florina Langen; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Tina Laengin; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
  • Christoph Niederhauser; Interregionale Blood Transfusion Swiss Red Cross, Bern, Switzerland
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21252203
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe Elecsys(R) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) has been developed for the in vitro quantitative detection of antibodies to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein. We evaluated the performance of this assay using samples from seven sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. MethodsAnonymized frozen, residual serum, or plasma samples from blood donation centers or routine diagnostic testing were used for this study. For specificity and sensitivity analyses, presumed negative samples collected before October 2019 and SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed single or sequential samples were tested, respectively. The performance of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay was also compared with other commercial immunoassays. ResultsThe overall specificity (n=7880 pre-pandemic samples) and sensitivity (n=240 PCR-positive samples [[≥]14 days post-PCR]) for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay were 99.95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.87-99.99) and 97.92% (95% CI 95.21- 99.32), respectively. Compared with seven other immunoassays, the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay had comparable or greater specificity and sensitivity. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay had significantly higher specificity compared with the LIAISON(R) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG, ADVIA Centaur(R) SARS-CoV-2 Total, ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG, iFlash-SARS-CoV-2 IgM, and EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA assays, and significantly higher sensitivity ([≥]14 days post-PCR) compared with the ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG, iFlash-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, and EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays. ConclusionThe Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay demonstrated a robust and favorable performance across samples from multiple European sites, with a very high specificity and sensitivity for the detection of anti-S antibodies.
Licença
cc_by
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Experimental_studies Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Experimental_studies Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...