Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining the cutoff points of the 5C scale for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines psychological antecedents among the Arab population: A multinational study
Ramy Ghazy; Samar Abd ElHafeez; Ramy Shaban; Iffat Elbarazi; Marwa Shawky Abdou; Ahmed Mohamed Ramadan; Khalid A. Kheirallah.
Afiliação
  • Ramy Ghazy; High Institute of Public Health
  • Samar Abd ElHafeez; High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt
  • Ramy Shaban; Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University, USA
  • Iffat Elbarazi; Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, UAE
  • Marwa Shawky Abdou; Epidemiology Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt
  • Ahmed Mohamed Ramadan; National Research Centre
  • Khalid A. Kheirallah; (5) Department of Public Health, Medical School of Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254461
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BackgroundOne of the newly faced challenges during the COVID-19 is vaccine hesitancy (VH). The validated 5C scale, that assesses five psychological antecedents of vaccination, could be effective in exploring COVID-19 VH. This study aimed to determine a statistically valid cutoff points for the 5C sub-scales among the Arab population. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 446 subjects from three Arab countries (Egypt, United Arab Emirates UAE, and Jordan). Information regarding sociodemographics, clinical history, COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, and 5C scale were collected online. The 5C scores were analyzed to define the cutoff points using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and to verify the capability of the questionnaire to differentiate whether responders are hesitant or non-hesitant to accept vaccination. ROC curve analysis was conducted setting for previous vaccine administration as a response, with the predictors being the main five domains of the 5C questionnaire. The mean score of each sub-scale was compared with COVID-19 vaccine intake ResultsThe mean age of the studied population was 37{+/-}11, 42.9% were males, 44.8% from Egypt, 21.1% from Jordan, and 33.6% from UAE. Statistically significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants, respectively, weredetetd in the median score of confidence [6.0(1.3) versus 4.7(2.0)], complacency [(2.7(2.0) versus 3.0(2.0), constraints [1.7(1.7) versus 3.7(2.3)], and collective responsibility [6.7(1.7) versus 5.7(1.7)]. The area under the curve of the five scales was 0.72, 0.60, 0.76, 0.66, 0.66 for confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility at cutoff values of 5.7, 4.7, 6.0, 6.3, and 6.2, respectively. Conclusionthe Arabic validated version of the 5C scale has a good discriminatory power to predict COVID-19 vaccines antecedent.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...