Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SARS-CoV-2 is detectable using sensitive RNA saliva testing days before viral load reaches detection range of low-sensitivity nasal swab tests
Emily S. Savela; Alexander Winnett; Anna E. Romano; Michael K. Porter; Natasha Shelby; Reid Akana; Jenny Ji; Matthew M. Cooper; Noah W. Schlenker; Jessica A. Reyes; Alyssa M. Carter; Jacob T. Barlow; Colten Tognazzini; Matthew Feaster; Ying-Ying Goh; Rustem F. Ismagilov.
Afiliação
  • Emily S. Savela; California Institute of Technology
  • Alexander Winnett; California Institute of Technology
  • Anna E. Romano; California Institute of Technology
  • Michael K. Porter; California Institute of Technology
  • Natasha Shelby; California Institute of Technology
  • Reid Akana; California Institute of Technology
  • Jenny Ji; California Institute of Technology
  • Matthew M. Cooper; California Institute of Technology
  • Noah W. Schlenker; California Institute of Technology
  • Jessica A. Reyes; California Institute of Technology
  • Alyssa M. Carter; California Institute of Technology
  • Jacob T. Barlow; California Institute of Technology
  • Colten Tognazzini; Pasadena Public Health Department
  • Matthew Feaster; Pasadena Public Health Department
  • Ying-Ying Goh; Pasadena Public Health Department
  • Rustem F. Ismagilov; California Institute of Technology
Preprint em En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254771
ABSTRACT
Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical to reduce asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, curb the spread of variants by travelers, and maximize treatment efficacy. Low-sensitivity nasal-swab testing (antigen and some nucleic-acid-amplification tests) is commonly used for surveillance and symptomatic testing, but the ability of low-sensitivity nasal-swab tests to detect the earliest stages of infection has not been established. In this case-ascertained study, initially-SARS-CoV-2-negative household contacts of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 prospectively self-collected paired anterior-nares nasal-swab and saliva samples twice daily for viral-load quantification by high-sensitivity RT-qPCR and digital-RT-PCR assays. We captured viral-load profiles from the incidence of infection for seven individuals and compared diagnostic sensitivities between respiratory sites. Among unvaccinated persons, high-sensitivity saliva testing detected infection up to 4.5 days before viral loads in nasal swabs reached the limit of detection of low-sensitivity nasal-swab tests. For most participants, nasal swabs reached higher peak viral loads than saliva, but were undetectable or at lower loads during the first few days of infection. High-sensitivity saliva testing was most reliable for earliest detection. Our study illustrates the value of acquiring early (within hours after a negative high-sensitivity test) viral-load profiles to guide the appropriate analytical sensitivity and respiratory site for detecting earliest infections. Such data are challenging to acquire but critical to design optimal testing strategies in the current pandemic and will be required for responding to future viral pandemics. As new variants and viruses emerge, up-to-date data on viral kinetics are necessary to adjust testing strategies for reliable early detection of infections.
Licença
cc_by
Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 09-preprints Base de dados: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 09-preprints Base de dados: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint