Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Simplified Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound Protocol to Detect Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
Thomas F Heyne; Benjamin P. Geisler; Kay Negishi; Daniel S. Choi; Ahad A. Al Saud; Lucas X. Marinacci; Patrick Y. Smithedajkul; Lily R. Devaraj; Brent P. Little; Dexter P. Mendoza; Efren J. Flores; Milena Petranovic; Steven P. Toal; Hamid Shokoohi; Andrew S. Liteplo.
Afiliação
  • Thomas F Heyne; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Benjamin P. Geisler; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Kay Negishi; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Daniel S. Choi; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Ahad A. Al Saud; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Lucas X. Marinacci; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Patrick Y. Smithedajkul; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Lily R. Devaraj; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brent P. Little; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Dexter P. Mendoza; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Efren J. Flores; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Milena Petranovic; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Steven P. Toal; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Hamid Shokoohi; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Andrew S. Liteplo; Massachusetts General Hospital
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254974
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesTo assess the diagnostic performance of lung point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) compared to either a positive nucleic acid test (NAT) or a COVID-19-typical pattern on computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate opportunities to simplify a POCUS algorithm. MethodsHospital-admitted adult inpatients with (1) either confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and (2) a completed or ordered CT within the preceding 24 hours were recruited. Twelve lung zones were scanned with a handheld POCUS machine. POCUS, CT, and X-ray (CXR) images were reviewed independently by blinded experts. A simplified POCUS algorithm was developed via machine learning. ResultsOf 79 enrolled subjects, 26.6% had a positive NAT and 31.6% had a CT typical for COVID-19. The receiver operator curve (ROC) for a 12-zone POCUS protocol had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.787 for positive NAT and 0.820 for typical CT. A simplified four-zone protocol had an AUC of 0.862 for typical CT and 0.862 for positive NAT. CT had an AUC of 0.815 for positive NAT; CXR had AUCs of 0.793 for positive NAT and 0.733 for typical CT. Performance of the four-zone protocol was superior to CXR for positive NAT (p=0.0471). Using a two-point cutoff system, the four-zone POCUS protocol had a sensitivity of 0.920 and 0.904 compared to CT and NAT, respectively, at the lower cutoff; it had a specificity of 0.926 and 0.948 at the higher cutoff, respectively. ConclusionPOCUS outperformed CXR to predict positive NAT. POCUS could potentially replace other chest imaging for persons under investigation for COVID-19.
Licença
cc_no
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Experimental_studies / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Experimental_studies / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...