Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The comparison of vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in China and the United States
Taoran Liu; Zonglin He; Jian Huang; Ni Yan; Qian Chen; Fengqiu Huang; Yuejia Zhang; Omoloma M Akinwunmi; Babatunde O Akinwunmi; Casper J. P. Zhang; Yibo Wu; Wai-kit Ming.
Afiliação
  • Taoran Liu; Jinan University
  • Zonglin He; Jinan University
  • Jian Huang; Imperial College London
  • Ni Yan; Jinan University
  • Qian Chen; Jinan University
  • Fengqiu Huang; Jinan University
  • Yuejia Zhang; Jinan University
  • Omoloma M Akinwunmi; University of Ibadan Nigeria
  • Babatunde O Akinwunmi; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Casper J. P. Zhang; The University of Hong Kong
  • Yibo Wu; Peking University Health Science Center
  • Wai-kit Ming; Jinan University
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21256317
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesTo investigate the differences in vaccine hesitancy and preference of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines between two countries, viz. China and the United States (US). MethodA cross-national survey was conducted in both China and the US, and discrete choice experiments as well as Likert scales were utilized to assess vaccine preference and the underlying factors contributing to the vaccination acceptance. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to enable a direct comparison between the two countries. ResultsA total of 9,077 (5,375 and 3,702, respectively, from China and the US) respondents have completed the survey. After propensity score matching, over 82.0% respondents from China positively accept the COVID-19 vaccination, while 72.2% respondents form the US positively accept it. Specifically, only 31.9% of Chinese respondents were recommended by a doctor to have COVID-19 vaccination, while more than half of the US respondents were recommended by a doctor (50.2%), local health board (59.4%), or friends and families (64.8%). The discrete choice experiments revealed that respondents from the US attached the greatest importance to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (44.41%), followed by the cost of vaccination (29.57%), whereas those from China held a different viewpoint that the cost of vaccination covers the largest proportion in their trade-off (30.66%), and efficacy ranked as the second most important attribute (26.34%). Also, respondents from China tend to concerned much more about the adverse effect of vaccination (19.68% vs 6.12%) and have lower perceived severity of being infected with COVID-19. ConclusionWhile the overall acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination in both countries are high, underpinned distinctions between countries are observed. Owing to the differences in COVID-19 incidence rates, cultural backgrounds, and the availability of specific COVID-19 vaccines in two countries, the vaccine rollout strategies should be nation-dependent.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...