Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation, adoption and perceptions of telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
Rebecca Appleton; Julie Williams; Norha Vera San Juan; Justin Needle; Merle Schlief; Harriet Jordan; Luke Sheridan Rains; Lucy Goulding; Monika Badhan; Emily Roxburgh; Phoebe Barnett; Spyros Spyridonidis; Magdalena Tomaskova; Jiping Mo; Jasmine Harju-Seppanen; Zoe Haime; Ceclilia Casetta; Alexandra Papamichail; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; Alan Simpson; Nick Sevdalis; Fiona Gaughran; Sonia Johnson.
Afiliação
  • Rebecca Appleton; University College London
  • Julie Williams; King's College London
  • Norha Vera San Juan; King's College London
  • Justin Needle; City, University of London
  • Merle Schlief; University College London
  • Harriet Jordan; King's College London
  • Luke Sheridan Rains; University College London
  • Lucy Goulding; King's College London
  • Monika Badhan; Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust
  • Emily Roxburgh; Kingston iCope, Camden & Islington NHS Trust
  • Phoebe Barnett; University College London
  • Spyros Spyridonidis; University College London
  • Magdalena Tomaskova; University College London
  • Jiping Mo; University College London
  • Jasmine Harju-Seppanen; University College London
  • Zoe Haime; University College London
  • Ceclilia Casetta; University College London
  • Alexandra Papamichail; Kings College London
  • Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; University College London
  • Alan Simpson; Kings College London
  • Nick Sevdalis; Kings College London
  • Fiona Gaughran; Kings College London
  • Sonia Johnson; University College London
Preprint em En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21260018
Artigo de periódico
Um artigo publicado em periódico científico está disponível e provavelmente é baseado neste preprint, por meio do reconhecimento de similaridade realizado por uma máquina. A confirmação humana ainda está pendente.
Ver artigo de periódico
ABSTRACT
BackgroundEarly in 2020, mental health services had to rapidly shift from face-to-face models of care to delivering the majority of treatments remotely (by video or phone call or occasionally messaging) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in several challenges for staff and patients, but also in benefits such as convenience or increased access for people with impaired mobility or in rural areas. There is a need to understand the extent and impacts of telemental health implementation, and barriers and facilitators to its effective and acceptable use. This is relevant both to future emergency adoption of telemental health, and to debates on its future use in routine mental health care. ObjectiveTo investigate the adoption and impacts of telemental health approaches during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and facilitators and barriers to optimal implementation. MethodsFour databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science) were searched for primary research relating to remote working, mental health care, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint servers were also searched. Results of studies were synthesised using framework synthesis. ResultsA total of 77 papers met our inclusion criteria. In most studies, the majority of contacts could be transferred to a remote form during the pandemic, and good acceptability to service users and clinicians tended to be reported, at least where the alternative to remote contacts was interrupting care. However, a range of impediments to dealing optimal care by this means were also identified. ConclusionsImplementation of telemental health allowed some continuing support to the majority of service users during the COVID-19 pandemic and has value in an emergency situation. However, not all service users can be reached by this means, and better evidence is now needed on long-term impacts on therapeutic relationships and quality of care, and on impacts on groups at risk of digital exclusion and how to mitigate these.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 09-preprints Base de dados: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudo: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct / Review / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 09-preprints Base de dados: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudo: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct / Review / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint