Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Vaccine Prioritization Reduce Disparities in Covid-19 Burden for Historically Marginalized Populations?
Erik Rosenstrom; Jessica A. Mele; Julie Ivy; Maria Mayorga; Mehul Patel; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Karl D Johnson; Paul Delamater; Pinar Keskinocak; Ross Boyce; Raymond Smith; Julie L Swann.
Afiliação
  • Erik Rosenstrom; North Carolina State University
  • Jessica A. Mele; North Carolina State University
  • Julie Ivy; North Carolina State University
  • Maria Mayorga; North Carolina State University
  • Mehul Patel; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Kristen Hassmiller Lich; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Karl D Johnson; University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Paul Delamater; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Pinar Keskinocak; Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Ross Boyce; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Raymond Smith; East Carolina University
  • Julie L Swann; North Carolina State University
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21261210
ABSTRACT
1.ImportanceNationally stated goals for distributing SARS-CoV-2 vaccines included to reduce COVID-19 mortality, morbidity, and inequity using prioritization groups. However, the impact of these prioritization strategies is not well understood, particularly their effect on health inequity in COVID-19 burden for historically marginalized racial and ethnic populations. ObjectiveTo assess the impact of vaccination prioritization and operational strategies on disparities in COVID-19 burden among historically marginalized populations, and on mortality and morbidity by race and ethnicity. DesignWe use an agent-based simulation model of North Carolina to project SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-associated deaths (mortality), hospitalizations (morbidity), and cases over 18 months (7/1/2020-12/31/2021) with vaccine distribution beginning 12/13/2020 to frontline medical and people 75+, assuming initial uptake similar to influenza vaccine. We study two-stage subsequent prioritization including essential workers ("essential"), adults 65+ ("age"), adults with high-risk health conditions, HMPs, or people in low income tracts, with eligibility for the general population in the third stage. For age-essential and essential-age strategies, we also simulated maximal uptake (100% for HMP or 100% for everyone), and we allowed for distribution to susceptible-only people. ResultsPrioritizing Age then Essential had the largest impact on mortality (2.5% reduction from no prioritization); Essential then Age had the lowest morbidity and reduced infections (4.2% further than Age-Essential) without significantly impacting mortality. Under each prioritization scenario, the age-adjusted mortality burden for HMPs is higher (e.g., 33.3-34.1% higher for the Black population, 13.3%-17.0% for the Hispanic population) compared to the White population, and the gap grew under some prioritizations. In the Age-Essential strategy, the burden on HMPs decreases only when uptake is increased to 100% in HMPs. However, the Black population still had the highest mortality rate even with the Susceptible-Only distribution. Conclusions and RelevanceSimulation results show that prioritization strategies have differential impact on mortality, morbidity, and disparities overall and by race and ethnicity. If prioritization schemes were not paired with increased uptake in HMPs, disparities did not improve and could worsen. Although equity was one of the tenets of vaccine distribution, the vaccination strategies publicly outlined are insufficient to remove and may exacerbate disparities between racial and ethnic groups, thus targeted strategies are needed for the future.
Licença
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Experimental_studies / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Experimental_studies / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...