Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment: A prospective multicenter cohort study
Kei Nakashima; Masayuki Ishida; Hiroyuki Matsui; Chihiro Yoshida; Tatsuya Nagai; Minoru Shiraga; Nakaoka Hiroshi; Yoshihito Otsuka; Yu Nakagama; Natsuko Kaku; Yuko Nitahara; Yasutoshi Kido; Hirota Yoshio.
Afiliação
  • Kei Nakashima; Kameda medical Center
  • Masayuki Ishida; Chikamori Hospital
  • Hiroyuki Matsui; Kameda Medical Center
  • Chihiro Yoshida; Kameda Medical Center
  • Tatsuya Nagai; Kameda Medical Center
  • Minoru Shiraga; Chikamori Hospital
  • Nakaoka Hiroshi; Chikamori Hospital
  • Yoshihito Otsuka; Kameda Medical Center
  • Yu Nakagama; Osaka City University
  • Natsuko Kaku; Osaka City University
  • Yuko Nitahara; Osaka City University
  • Yasutoshi Kido; Osaka City University
  • Hirota Yoshio; SOUSEIKAI Medical Group
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22276536
ABSTRACT
IntroductionThis study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment using two immunoassays.

Methods:

We enrolled lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment and non-cancer patients with chronic diseases; all participants were fully vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Blood samples were collected before the first and second vaccinations and 4 {+/-} 1 weeks after the second vaccination. Anti-acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein S1 subunit receptor-binding domain antibody titers were measured using the Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott Laboratory) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics). ResultsFifty-five lung cancer patients and 38 non-cancer patients were included in the immunogenicity analysis. Lung cancer patients showed significant increase in the geometric mean antibody titer, which was significantly lower than that in the non-cancer patients after the first (30 vs. 121 AU/mL, p<0.001 on Architect; 4.0 vs 1.2 U/mL, p<0.001, on Elecsys) and second vaccinations (1632 vs. 3472 AU/mL, p=0.005, on Architect; 213 vs 573 A/mL, p=0.002, on Elecsys). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for seroprotection was significantly lower in the lung cancer patients. Analysis of the anticancer treatment types showed that the adjusted OR for seroprotection was significantly lower in lung cancer patients receiving cytotoxic agents. Lung cancer patients showed no increase in the number of adverse reactions. ConclusionsBNT162b2 vaccination in lung cancer patients undergoing anticancer treatment significantly increased antibody titers and showed acceptable safety. However, the immunogenicity in these patients could be inadequate compared with that in non-cancer patients.
Licença
cc_no
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...