Randomized trail of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome / 中国当代儿科杂志
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
; (12): 524-526, 2010.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
| ID: wpr-347553
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (nSIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty preterm infants with RDS who received pulmonary surfactant were randomized to nSIMV and nCPAP groups after extubation. Clinical signs, symptoms and blood gas results following nSIMV or nCPAP were compared in the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with the nCPAP group, the nSIMV group had a lower incidence of failure respiratory support (24% vs 60%; P<0.05), a lower incidence of hypercarbonia (12% vs 40%; P<0.05) and a lower incidence of hypoxia (24% vs 36%; P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>nSIMV is more effective in respiratory support in preterm infants with RDS.</p>
Texto completo:
Disponível
Base de dados:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido
/
Terapêutica
/
Recém-Nascido Prematuro
/
Ventilação com Pressão Positiva Intermitente
/
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio clínico controlado
Limite:
Humanos
/
Recém-Nascido
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
Ano de publicação:
2010
Tipo de documento:
Artigo