Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A diagnostic meta-analysis:fiberoptic ductoscope versus galactography for the diagnostic value of nipple discharge / 实用医学杂志
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 2010-2013, 2015.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-467635
Biblioteca responsável: WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of fiberoptic ductoscope versus galactography for nipple discharge. Methods Literatures on comparing the diagnostic value of galactography with fiberoptic ductoseope (FDS) on the nipple discharge were searched from the Cochrane library, Evidence based medicine (EBM ),PubMed,China Vip database, and 8 studies were intaked. Then the data was analyzed by software Metadisc1.4 and Review Manager5.1. Results There are 1170 patients in the 8 studies. The pooled estimates for sensitivity of FDS and galactography was 82%, 78%, and the pooled estimates for specificity was 51%, 50%, respectively. The weighted AUC (area under curve) was 0.776, 0.705, Q*values was 0.715, 0.657, respectively. The sensitivities and specificity of the 2 methods were not significantly different. The overall diagnostic efficacy of FDS was better than that of galactography. Conclusion FDS is better than galaetography in the diagnostic value of nipple discharge.

Texto completo: Disponível Base de dados: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Revisão sistemática Idioma: Chinês Revista: The Journal of Practical Medicine Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Artigo
Texto completo: Disponível Base de dados: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Revisão sistemática Idioma: Chinês Revista: The Journal of Practical Medicine Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Artigo
...