A Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Streptocuccus pneumoniae urinary antigen test for adult ;community acquired Streptocuccus pneumoniae pneumoniae / 中华危重病急救医学

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Streptocuccus pneumoniae urinary antigen test (SpUAT) in patients with community acquired Streptocuccus pneumoniae pneumoniae (SPP). Methods The clinical studies relating SpUAT diagnostic accuracy for community acquired Streptocuccus pneumoniae infection were searched via computer and manual screening of Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc, China Technical Journal Full-text Database, and Wanfang Database as well as English databases such as PubMed, EBSCO, Elsevier Science, Ovid Technologies, and Springer. Data were extracted according to appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria and analyzed with Meta-disc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio as well as diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was plotted and area under SROC (AUC) was calculated to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of SpUAT for adult community acquired SPP. Results A total of 15 studies enrolling 6 866 patients were included, all of which with a quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) score not lower than 10, indicating a high study quality. Random effect model was applied owing to non-threshold effect associated heterogeneity. It was shown by Meta analysis that compared with routine pathogen diagnosis (hemoculture, sputum smears, sputum culture and trachea and bronchus attractive culture), the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio, and pooled negative likelihood ratio was 73% [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 71%-76%,] 91% (95%CI = 90%-92%), 6.97 (95%CI = 4.13-11.77), and 0.30 (95%CI = 0.26-0.34), respectively, pooled DOR was 24.34 (95%CI = 13.14-45.11), and AUC of SROC was 0.8051±0.0362. It was indicated by heterogeneity test that experiment design (prospective or retrospective), sample sizes (lower than 200 or higher than or equal to 200), reference test (fewer than 3 or more than or equal to 3 test methods), or literature language (Hispanic or non-Hispanic) had no effect on study heterogeneity, indicating certain other unknown factors may be involved. Funnel plot suggested that 15 involved studies uniformly distributed along the two sides of regression line, indicating no publication bias. Conclusions The use of SpUAT for the diagnosis of adult community acquired SPP has a moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Although the overall accuracy of SpUAT diagnosis is relatively high, there is significant heterogeneity among the studies, so more high-quality studies are needed.