Application of the combination of serum Helicobacter pylori antibody detection and pepsinogen examination in screening gastric cancer and gastric precancerous lesions / 中华消化杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To assess the role of the combination of Helicobacter pylori (H.polyri)antibody detection and serum pepsinogen (PG) examination (ABC method) in risk prediction of gastric cancer.Methods From July 2014 to July 2015,a total of 320 patients underwent gastroendoscopy examination because of stomach discomfort were enrolled.According to the results of serum H.polyri antibody test,PG Ⅰ and PG Ⅰ/PG Ⅱ ratio (PGR),patients were divided into four groupsgroup A was both H.polyri and PG negative,group B was H.polyri positive and PG negative,group C was both H.polyri and PG positive,group D was H.polyri negative and PG positive.The incidence rates of gastric cancer were compared among the groups.PG positive was defined as PG Ⅰ ≤70 μg/L and PGR≤3.0.And according to the results of gastroendoscopy examination and histopathology,the levels of gastrin 17,PG Ⅰ,PG Ⅱ and PGR of different atrophic regions with different pathological changes and atrophic degree were compared.Chi-square test and analysis of variance were performed for statistical analysis.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal cut-off value of serum PG Ⅰ and PGR in gastric cancer diagnosis.Results Among the 320 patients,there were 159 patients in group A,124 patients in group B,23 patients in group C and 14 patients in group D,respectively.The incidence of gastric cancer in group A,group B,group C and group D were 0.63％ (1/159),4.03％ (5/124),13.04％ (3/23) and 3/14,respectively.The incidences of gastric cancer in group C and D were much higher than those in group A and B (x2 =11.700 and 21.900,both P＞0.01).Among the 320 patients,there were 179 cases in non-atrophic gastritis group,129 in atrophic gastritis group and 12 in gastric cancer group.The PG Ⅰ and PGR levels of gastric cancer group were (46.84 ± 24.07) μg/L and 3.21 ±1.45,which were lower than those of atrophic group ((100.09±48.15) μg/L and 9.78±7.32) and nonatrophic group ((103.97 ± 44.72) μg/L and 13.09 ± 9.05),and the differences were statistically significant (F=12.460 and 30.290,both P＜0.01).The PGR level of severe atrophy group was 5.62±3.00,which was significantly lower than those of moderate atrophy group (10.04 ± 6.08) and mild atrophy group (11.61±4.05).And the PGⅡ level of severe atrophy group was (18.85±10.54) μg/L,which was much higher than those of moderate atrophy group ((14.63 ± 11.19) μg/L) and mild atrophy group ((10.88 ± 7.41) μg/L),and t he differences were statistically significant (F=8.057,P＜ 0.01;F =3.374,P=0.021).The gastrin 17 level of antrum atrophy group was 2.16 pmol/L (1.12 pmol/L to 4.15 pmol/L),which was lower than those of gastric body atrophy group (4.49 pmol/L,1.88 pmol/L to 18.71 pmol/L) and whole gastric atrophy group (6.18 pmol/L,2.63 pmol/L to 17.82 pmol/L),and the differences were statistically significant (H=13.408,P＜0.01).The optimal cut-off values of PG Ⅰ and PGR for the diagnosis of gastric cancer were 66.7 μg/L and 4.45.Conclusions ABC stratification has certain value in gastric cancer screening in China,however,it still needs improvement.For patients with digestive symptoms,PG Ⅰ ≤ 66.7 μg/L and PGR ≤4.45 can be considered as high risk of gastric cancer and suggested to receive gastroendoscopy examination.