Comparison of three kinds of nutritional screening tools in clinical application of general surgery patients application / 中国现代普通外科进展
Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
; (4): 454-457, 2017.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-609855
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the applicability and consistency of NRS2002,SGA and MNA in general surgery hospitalized patients and analyze the effect in clinical outcomes of NRS resuits with respect to each tool.Method:The 150 patients hospitalized in our hospital were chosen as object of study,to screen and evaluate nutritional risk of patients by NRS 2002,SGA and MNA,respectively,on the second hospital day,then to compare the consistency of NRS results with respect to the four tools on clinical outcomes.Results:The applicabilities of hospital NRS2002,SGA and MNA were alternatively 97.25,97.25% and 98.35%.The evaluation of patients' NRS corresponding to different four tools was consistent.The effects of screening results of MNA,NRS2002 and SGA on clinical outcomes were most closely related.Conclusion:The three nutritional evaluation tools can be applied to the screening of malnutrition in General Surgery.The effects of screening results of NRS2002 and SGA on clinical outcomes were most closely related.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
WPRIM
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Screening_studies
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Article