Efficacy analysis of jejunal side anastomosis combined with jejunal nutrition tube in gastric cancer surgery

Shifeng JIA; Jianquan ZHU; Bin ZHENG; Feng YAN

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the adverse reactions and postoperative inflammatory reactions of Bill-Roth Ⅱ (BⅡ) gastroenterostomy with jejunal anastomosis and jejunal nutrient tube placement using linear cutting and closing device in gastric cancer surgery.

Methods:

A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 93 patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery in The Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology from February 2017 to April 2020. According to 2016 (American Joint Committee on Cancer/Universal Integrated Circuit Card) AJCC/UICC, (Tumor, Node, stage; Tumor lymph node metastasis; Distant metastasis) TNM, there were 11 cases in stage ⅠA, 14 cases in stage ⅠB, 13 cases in stage ⅡA, 15 cases in stage ⅡB, 11 cases in stage ⅢA, 13 cases in stage ⅢB, and 16 cases in stage ⅢC. There were 51 cases of gastric antrum carcinoma, 26 cases of gastric body carcinoma and 16 cases of gastric pylorus carcinoma. There were 27 cases of papillary adenocarcinoma, 26 cases of tubular adenocarcinoma, 22 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, 9 cases of signet-ring cell carcinoma, 7 cases of adenosquamous carcinoma, and 2 cases of squamous carcinoma. The patients were divided into experimental group (48 cases) and control group (45 cases) according to whether or not the linear cutting and closing device was added and jejunal anastomosis was performed and jejunal nutrition tube was placed. The gender composition, age, lesion site, pathological type, pathological stage, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups, and the white blood cell count WBC, C-reactive protein CRP on the 7th day after surgery, erythrocyte Sedimentation rate (ESR), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammation indicators were compared between the two groups.

Results:

There was no significant difference in gender composition, age, lesion location, pathological type and pathological stage between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting and pleural effusion in 93 patients were 18.3%(17/93), 21.5%(20/93), 23.7%(22/93), 17.2%(16/93) and 18.3%(17/93), respectively. The complication rates of the above indexes in the two groups were 10.4% (5/48) Compared with 26.7% (12/45), 12.5% (6/48) and 31.1% (14/45), 15.6%(7/48) and 33.3% (15/45), 8.3%(4/48) and 26.7% (12/45), 8.3% (4/48) and 28.9% (13/45) (χ 2 values were 4.11, 4.77, 4.52, 4.27 and 5.27, respectively; P values were 0.043, 0.029, 0.033, 0.039 and 0.022, respectively). There was no significant difference in lower extremity venous thrombosis, anastomotic bleeding, accumulated pneumonia and incision dehiscence between the two groups ( P>0.05). WBC on the 7th day after operation in the experimental group and the control group (7.02±1.83)×10 9/L and (8.39±2.27)×10 9/L ( t=3.22, P=0.002), TNF-α (2.44±0.70) μg/L and (3.56±1.14) μg/L ( t=5.71, P<0.001), IL-6 (235.31±41.72) μg/L and (365.91±73.16) μg/L ( t=10.66, P<0.001) there was significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in CRP and ESR between the two groups on the 7th day after operation ( P>0.05). The postoperative hospital stay between the experimental group and the control group was (13.88±2.81) d and (22.78±2.51) d, the difference was statistically significant ( t=16.07, P<0.001).

Conclusion:

The application of side-to-side jejunostomy combined with jejunal nutrition tube for enteral nutrition in gastric cancer surgery can reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions such as postoperative abdominal pain, abdominal distension, accumulated pneumonia, nausea, vomiting and pleural effusion, reduce the postoperative hospital stay and reduce the postoperative inflammatory reaction to a certain extent.