Essential medicine selection during the COVID-19 pandemic: Enabling access in uncharted territory

The COVID-19 pandemic requires urgent decisions regarding treatment policy in the face of rapidly evolving evidence. In response, the South African Essential Medicines List Committee established a subcommittee to systematically review and appraise emerging evidence, within very short timelines, in order to inform the National Department of Health COVID-19 treatment guidelines. To date, the subcommittee has reviewed 14 potential treatments, and made recommendations based on local context, feasibility, resource requirements and equity. Here we describe the rapid review and evidence-to-decision process, using remdesivir and dexamethasone as examples. Our experience is that conducting rapid reviews is a practical and efficient way to address medicine policy questions under pandemic conditions

Clinician Compliance with Laboratory Monitoring and Prescribing Guidelines in HIV-1-Infected Patients Receiving Tenofovir

BACKGROUND:Tenofovir is part of the preferred first-line regimen for HIV-infected patients in South Africa (SA); but is associated with kidney toxicity. SA antiretroviral therapy (ART) guidelines recommend creatinine monitoring at baseline (ART start) and at 3; 6 and 12 months; and substituting tenofovir with zidovudine; stavudine or abacavir should creatinine clearance (CrCl) decrease to etlt;50 mL/min. OBJECTIVE:To assess clinician compliance with tenofovir monitoring and prescribing guidelines.METHODS:We described the proportion of adult patients on tenofovir-based first-line ART who were screened for baseline renal impairment; were monitored according to the SA antiretroviral treatment guidelines; and were switched from tenofovir if renal function declined.RESULTS:We included 13 168 patients who started ART from 2010 to 2012. Creatinine concentrations were recorded in 11 712 (88.9%) patients on tenofovir at baseline; 9 135/11 657 (78.4%) at 3 months; 5 426/10 554 (51.4%) at 6 months; and 5 949/ 8 421 (70.6%) at 12 months. At baseline; 227 (1.9%) started tenofovir despite a CrCl etlt;50 mL/min. While on tenofovir; 525 patients had at least one CrCl of etlt;50 mL/min. Of 382 patients with =3 months' follow-up after a CrCl etlt;50 mL/min; 114 (29.8%) stopped tenofovir within 3 months. Clinicians were more likely to stop tenofovir in patients with lower CrCl and CD4 count. Of 226 patients who continued to receive tenofovir and had further CrCls available; 156 (69.0%) had a CrCl =50 mL/min at their next visit.CONCLUSIONS:Creatinine monitoring is feasible where access to laboratory services is good. Kidney function recovered in most patients who continued to receive tenofovir despite a CrCl etlt;50 mL/min. Further research is needed to determine how best to monitor renal function with tenofovir in resource-limited settings