Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
S. Afr. j. child health (Online) ; 9(4): 108-111, 2015.
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1270453

ABSTRACT

Background. The Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) in South Africa (SA) has had a large effect on vaccine-preventable illnesses; yet there is little in the literature describing access to and utilisation of the programme beyond 1 year of age. Coverage of vitamin A supplementation is examined through District Health Information System data; but this does not give a fair assessment of the lifetime coverage in a child or provide any correlation with the immunisation status of the child. Objectives. To describe utilisation and dropout rate with the vitamin A and immunisation programmes over the first 6 years of life among children aged 6 - 8 years in a semi-urban population in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Province; SA. A secondary objective was to investigate whether access and dropout rates are associated between these two programmes. Methods. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 923 anonymised Road-to-Health cards; extracting information on immunisation and vitamin A coverage. Results. Overall; 92.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.2 - 94.6) and 88.5% (95% CI 86.4 - 90.5) of children were fully immunised by 12 months and 18 months of age; respectively. The percentage of children fully immunised by 6 years of age dropped to 44% (95% CI 41.2 - 47.6). The dropout rates for measles; and diphtheria; pertussis and tetanus 1 - 3 vaccination were 2.4% and 1.2%; respectively. Vitamin A had an overall coverage of 34.9% during 6 - 60 months of life for this population; with children receiving; on average; three doses (interquartile range 2 - 5). Conclusion. Despite good immunisation coverage in the first 18 months of life; there was relatively poor vitamin A coverage; suggesting a need for re-evaluation of the current vitamin A capsule distribution programme


Subject(s)
Child , Immunization , Vitamin A , Vitamin A/therapeutic use
2.
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1270402

ABSTRACT

The transmission of HIV through breastmilk; with the potential to infect the newborn; has had a major impact on child health worldwide. Although South African studies confirmed that exclusive breastfeeding reduced rates of mother-to-child transmission of HIV; the recommendation of formula feeding for HIV-exposed newborn infants; provided their mothers had the facilities for safe preparation of formula milk and complied with the AFASS criteria (formula feeding to be Acceptable; Feasible; Affordable; Sustainable; Safe); was introduced. Observations made by the nursing staff; fully aware of the risks of formula feeding; in the neonatal unit at King Edward VIII Hospital in 2009 showed that an increasing number of small; sick newborns were being formula fed.By conducting focus group discussions with nurses; mothers and counsellors and teasing out the confusions and misconceptions; relevant information was imparted to the groups to allow them to re-consider their misconceptions. Within a period of 2 months nurses were confident about re-counselling mothers with respect to appropriate feeding choices. HIV-positive mothers were trained to flash-heat their milk. Subsequently; policies for the unit were derived from the focus group discussions. In addition; regional hospitals in the Durban area (eThekweni) considered the introduction of flash-heating to their units. The South African Department of Health opted for infants to receive prophylaxis with daily nevirapine as long as they are breastfed; and the Nutrition Directorate decided to withdraw the issue of free replacement feeds in HIV-exposed babies. KZN was the first province to institute this policy. The Department of Health has recommended that neonatal units no longer encourage HIV-infected mothers to flash-heat their breastmilk unless the infant is not receiving ARV prophylaxis or the mother is not on treatment


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , HIV Seropositivity , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , South Africa , Therapeutic Misconception
3.
SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j ; 98(4): 209-212, 2008.
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1271409

ABSTRACT

Background : Dual protection is recommended for prevention of unwanted pregnancies and protection against sexually transmitted infections; including HIV. It is critical for HIV-negative women to prevent sero-conversion and HIV transmission to their infants during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Methods: Women were followed post-partum; monthly to 9 months and 3-monthly to 24 months; in a cohort study investigating postnatal HIV transmission. Study nurses discussed family planning; including condom use; at each visit. Contraceptive methods used since the last visit were recorded. All women knew their HIV status; most women breastfed for a minimum of six months.Results : of 1137 HIV-positive and 1220 HIV-negative women the most common contraceptive method was the hormonal injectable; few women used condoms alone or as dual contraception (0-3 months 6.8; 7-12 months 16.3; 19-24 months 14.4). HIV-positive women were more likely to use condoms in years one and two post-partum (AOR 1.72; 95CI 1.38-2.14; pp=0.040). Conclusions. More creative ways of promoting condoms and dual contraception need to be found if new HIV infections; in women and children; are to be prevented


Subject(s)
HIV , Breast Feeding , Contraception , HIV Seroprevalence , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Sexually Transmitted Diseases
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL