Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Borno Med. J. (Online) ; 17(1): 1-9, 2020. ilus
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1259675

ABSTRACT

Background: The efficacy of palliative external beam radiotherapy (PRT) for relief of metastatic bone pain had been well established, a single fraction is as effective as multiple fractions in relieving bone pain, but variation exist among the radiation oncologist in our environment on the ideal dose per fraction regimen. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from breast cancer patients treated with PRT using linear accelerator for metastatic bone pain in University College Hospital Ibadan between 2005 and 2009. The extracted information includes bio-data, presenting symptoms, metastatic sites, and bone pain assessment before and after four weeks of PRT using visual analogue pain scale (VAS), radiation doses, fractionation numbers and number of re-irradiation. Results: There were 161 eligible breast cancer patients who were treated with PRT secondary to painful bone metastases between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2009. Majority were females with only 1.2% male patients (Figure 1). Table 1 showed demographic characteristics of treated patients with mean age of 45.2 years, pain was the major presenting complaint (92.5%) and multiple bony metastases constituted the highest metastatic presentation (52.2%). Table 2 shows patient's responses to PRT treatment for pain relief (complete responses of 88.8% and 11.2% partial responses). No significant association between patient's responses to PRT and magnitude of radiation doses delivered. However, fractionation sizes were significantly associated with re-irradiation p-value < 0.05. Conclusion: No differences exist between various dose fractionation schemes in terms of relief from painful bony metastases. However, shorter dose fractionation schemes are associated with re-irradiation of previously irradiated sites


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones , Breast Neoplasms , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Neoplasm Metastasis , Nigeria
2.
Ann. afr. med ; 18(3): 127-131, 2019.
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1258907

ABSTRACT

Background: Brain metastasis is a dreaded complication that significantly reduces the quality of life in breast cancer patients. The treatment options are limited by the inability of many chemotherapeutic agents to cross the blood­brain barrier. Surgery also has a limited role, except in few selected patients with oligometastasis. Therefore, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains the available option that gives a gratifying result. However, the benefit of this treatment modality in our resource-poor environment needs to be investigated. Materials and Methods: The data of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis who were treated with WBRT using cobalt-60 equipment between 2005 and 2009 were retrospectively collected from the departmental medical record unit. The information extracted included biodata, presenting symptoms, imaging modality for confirmation of brain metastasis, treatment records, performance status pre-WBRT and 4 weeks post-WBRT, and other supportive treatments. Results: A total of 52 female patients were reviewed between 2005 and 2009. The mean age of patients was 44.7 years. The common clinical features on presentation were headache, nausea, and visual impairment in 30.8% of patients with the WHO performance status score ranging between 2 and 4. Patients with more than three brain deposits accounted for 71.2% of all the brain metastases. The mean radiation dose used for WBRT was 30 Gy in 10 fractions, and total responses recorded were 86.5% with 53.8% complete improvement in patients' performance status 4 weeks after WBRT treatment. Conclusion: WBRT is an effective treatment modality for patients with brain metastasis in our resource-poor environment. However, improvement of patients' performance status declined with advancing age


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/complications , Breast Neoplasms , Female , Heavy Ion Radiotherapy , Nigeria , Patients
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL