ABSTRACT
Background: Pelvic fractures are orthopaedic emergencies associated with polytrauma. These fractures have gradually increased in recent times as a result of increasing high speed and complex road traffic accidents. Objective: To describe the presentation and management outcome of patients that were managed in our institution for pelvic fractures over the study period. Methodology: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of patients who were admitted and treated in our hospital with pelvic injuries from February 2012 to January 2015. Results: Majority 122 (75.8%) of the patients in this study were aged below 40 years. These fractures were mostly caused by road traffic accidents. Most 116 (71.9%) of our patients had Tile class A and B fractures. Polytrauma seen in 41.6% of the patients was the most common associated injury seen with pelvic fractures. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) 31.4 shows that these patients were mostly severely injured patients. The fatality rate in this study was 16.12%. These mortality were higher for patients with Tile class C than B injury and no death was recorded for class A injuries. Conclusion: Majority of the patients were less than 40 years and Road Traffic Accident is the commonest aetiology. Many were successfully managed conservatively particularly those with stable and partially stable injuries. Functional outcome is generally good
Subject(s)
Injury Severity Score , Patients , PelvisABSTRACT
Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of death among Nigerian women. Patients typically present late with advanced and aggressive diseases from a younger age. Cure for breast cancer is only possible when the disease is discovered early and breast cancer screening greatly increases the chances of early detection. We present the results of a breast cancer screening program at the Taimako Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Centre; Lafia; Nigeria. Methodology: This is a prospective study of subjects who presented to our breast cancer screening centre between May 2009 and April 2010. A community mobilization and awareness campaign was mounted 3 months before screening began. A structured questionnaire was administered on each subject to elicit demographic data and risk factors. Each had a clinical breast examination. Those 35 years and above had a mammography while those below 35 years had breast ultrasound scan. Where a lump was discovered; it was subjected to tissue biopsy and histology. Results: Two thousand and ninety five subjects were seen over the one year period. Mean age was 34 + 12 years. Mean age at menarche was at 14.3 + 1.7 years; mean parity was 3.6 +2.6. Two thousand and thirty six subjects (97.2) had some knowledge about breast cancer; 1;269 (60.5) had no formal education; 881(42.1) were petty traders while 501(23.9) were full time housewives. Four hundred and seventy (22.4) had a positive family history of breast disease; 437 (20.9) had history of use of oral contraceptives; and 9 (0.4) had a previous breast biopsy. Four hundred and sixty one (22.0) complained of breast discomfort; 184 (8.8) complained of breast lumps; but only 95 (4.6) of them had lump on clinical breast examination; while a further 8 (0.4) lumps were found on breast imaging. One thousand nine hundred (90.7) had normal breast screening results; 166 (7.9) had benign breast diseases and 29 (1.4) had breast cancer. Conclusion: Knowledge about breast cancer was high because of prior campaigns and should be encouraged. Proportion of subjects with breast cancer is low even though many complained of breast lumps on presentation. Majority of the lumps were found at clinical breast examination while mammogram had a very low yield. A treatment arm needs to be incorporated into the screening program to demonstrate survival benefit
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Mass ScreeningABSTRACT
Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of death among Nigerian women. Patients typically present late with advanced and aggressive diseases from a younger age. Cure for breast cancer is only possible when the disease is discovered early and breast cancer screening greatly increases the chances of early detection. We present the results of a breast cancer screening program at the Taimako Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Centre; Lafia; Nigeria. Methodology: This is a prospective study of subjects who presented to our breast cancer screening centre between May 2009 and April 2010. A community mobilization and awareness campaign was mounted 3 months before screening began. A structured questionnaire was administered on each subject to elicit demographic data and risk factors. Each had a clinical breast examination. Those 35 years and above had a mammography while those below 35 years had breast ultrasound scan. Where a lump was discovered; it was subjected to tissue biopsy and histology. Results: Two thousand and ninety five subjects were seen over the one year period. Mean age was 34 + 12 years. Mean age at menarche was at 14.3 + 1.7 years; mean parity was 3.6 +2.6. Two thousand and thirty six subjects (97.2) had some knowledge about breast cancer; 1;269 (60.5) had no formal education; 881(42.1) were petty traders while 501(23.9) were full time housewives. Four hundred and seventy (22.4) had a positive family history of breast disease; 437 (20.9) had history of use of oral contraceptives; and 9 (0.4) had a previous breast biopsy. Four hundred and sixty one (22.0) complained of breast discomfort; 184 (8.8) complained of breast lumps; but only 95 (4.6) of them had lump on clinical breast examination; while a further 8 (0.4) lumps were found on breast imaging. One thousand nine hundred (90.7) had normal breast screening results; 166 (7.9) had benign breast diseases and 29 (1.4) had breast cancer. Conclusion: Knowledge about breast cancer was high because of prior campaigns and should be encouraged. Proportion of subjects with breast cancer is low even though many complained of breast lumps on presentation. Majority of the lumps were found at clinical breast examination while mammogram had a very low yield. A treatment arm needs to be incorporated into the screening program to demonstrate survival benefit