ABSTRACT
Background: Surgeons carry out procedures on patients daily, many of which are invasive and may be associated with some risks and complications. The concept of informed consent in surgical practice was introduced after certain legal issues arose. Today patients are entitled to know and be accorded the right to determine what happens to their bodies. This study set out to determine if there had been any improvement in the informed consent process over the years, taking a closer look at the various aspects of the information given :This was a cross-sectional study carried out at the Department of Surgery, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. One hundred consecutive post-operative patients were recruited and interviewed on information discussed at various stages during the preoperative period and on the administration of the consent form. Results: Thirty seven (66.0%) out of 56 elective cases felt they had been given enough information to their understanding to enable them give informed consent. Thirty (68.1%) out of 44 emergencies also felt they had been given enough information. Forty (71.4%) of elective cases were able tell what their diagnosis was but only 23 (41.0%) knew what procedure had been done. Similarly 32 (72.2%) emergency cases were able to tell what their diagnosis was but only 16 (36.3%) knew what procedure had been done. Conclusion: Informed consent in the Department of Surgery of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital is unsatisfactory and needs to be improved