Effect of combining epidural with general anesthesia on recovery after spine surgery: randomized controlled study

Background: Fast track techniques have been applied to reduce surgical stress response and to provide effective perioperative analgesia, thereby improving patient''''''''s recovery and reducing postoperative morbidity. The present study was undertaken to assess the effect of using combined general/epidural anesthesia (CGEA) on early recovery after lumbar spine surgeries. Subjects and Methods: The current prospective randomized clinical study had included a total of 40 patients who underwent elective one or two level laminectomy/discectomy. Patients were randomized and divided into two groups; general anesthesia (GA) group (group I) and combined general/epidural anesthesia group (CGEA) (group II). Patient characteristics, anesthesia time, surgical time, heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), anesthetic / analgesic requirements, the occurrence of intraoperative bradycardia and/or hypotension, time to extubation, time to post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and duration of PACU stay were recorded and considered for analysis. Results: It was observed that CGEA was significantly associated with reduction of intraoperative anesthetics / analgesic requirements, shorter time to extubation, time for PACU discharge and duration of PACU stay but on the expense of higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension. Conclusion: This study proved that CGEA seems to be an effective fast track anesthetic protocol in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgeries

Revision surgery in lumbar degenerative disease

Introduction: Lumbar degenerative disease is a common health problem all over the world and the need for revision surgery is still high with variable results. The aim of the work: Is to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcome in cases of redo surgery for lumbar degenerative pathology and to specify which pathology is responding well to revision surgery.Patients and methods: Forty eight patients were operated upon for revision of previous failed back surgery in Zagazig University Hospitals from August 2014 to April 2017. Selection of patients for revision surgery depends on confirmed radiological and clinical compression or instability. All patients were operated and followed for at least 6 months after surgery. VAS score was used as a tool for evaluation of back and leg pain.Results: There were 48 patients; with a mean age of 46.7 years (range 22-78).There were 29 males and 19 females. The dominant symptoms were unilateral sciatica in 30, bilateral in 11, low back pain in 23 patients.Neurogenic claudication was present in 4 cases. Type of surgery was redo discectomy in 31 cases, revision decompression for spinal canal stenosis in 4 cases, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in 13 cases, with success rate of 96.8%, 75% and 84.6% respectively regarding improvement after surgery.Conclusion: Revision surgery of lumbar degenerative diseases gives excellent results provided that the patients are properly selected