A National Survey of Oxytocin Use during Caesarean Section in Zimbabwe

Background: Post-partum haemorrhage is the leading cause of mortality for labouring women in Zimbabwe. Current literature supports the use of low dose oxytocin to prevent bleeding during Caesarean section. Internationally; clinical practice has been slow to change and the use of potentially harmful; higher than recommended dose is common.Objective: To describe the current clinical practice in Zimbabwe.Design: A self-administered questionnaire survey. Descriptive statistics were used to report the study results.Setting: In 2013 a national survey was conducted on the use of oxytocin by different types of clinicians; who provide either anaesthesia or surgery for Caesarean section.Results: Of a total of 221 (61%) questionnaires returned; 170 (80%) were completed fully. Only 23% of respondents would give an intravenous dose of 5.0 IU or less of oxytocin for elective Caesarean section. The majority of clinicians (77%) would administer more than 5.0 IU of oxytocin at elective. A significant number of nurse anaesthetists 16/59 (27%); and a non-negligible number of specialist anaesthetists 3/48 (6%) would even give 20 IU of oxytocin in elective cases rising to 30% and 13% respectively for emergency cases. In case of persistent bleeding due to uterine atony; oxytocin was more likely to be repeated (45%); rather than using misoprostol (25%) or ergometrine (19%). Conclusion: Most clinicians in Zimbabwe use oxytocin doses well above current internationally recommended. This illustrates the urgent need for updated national guidelines for the prevention of post-partum haemorrhage during Caesarean section

The Baby has not Come: Obstructed Labour

Antenatal care can pick out some women who are at risk of obstructed labour and a plan should be made for them to deliver in hospital. Careful monitoring in labour with appropriate use of abdominal and vaginal examinations can identify those who are not progressing. The partograph can give this valuable information in visual form. If the contractions are not regular and strong the safe use of oxytocin will increase the number of normal deliveries and therefore avoid some Caesarean sections

A comparison of orally administered misoprostol and membrane sweeping for labour induction in uncomplicated singleton post-term pregnancies

Objectives. This study assessed the efficacy of the two outpatient processes of single-dose 50 µg oral misoprostol (OM) and membrane sweeping (MS) on the outcome of labour induction and the possibility of reducing the need for hospital admission for cervical ripening/labour induction in uncomplicated post-term singleton pregnancies at a tertiary health institution in south-western Nigeria. Methods. A total of 100 patients were equally randomised into the two groups between April 2007 and March 2010. Primary outcome measures were delivery within 48 hours after the start of induction and route of delivery. Secondary outcome measures were time interval from induction to onset of labour (latency period), time interval from start of induction to delivery (duration of labour), need for oxytocin augmentation, labour complications, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, and need for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results. Both groups were similar at the baseline with regard to age, parity and days beyond 40 weeks' gestation. There was a significantly shorter induction to onset of labour (latency) interval in the OM group, with a mean of 17.0 hours compared with 31.9 hours in the MS group (p=0.005), with 82.0% of the patients in the OM group in spontaneous labour within the latency period of 18 hours as opposed to 32.6% of the MS group (p<0.005). Forty-two patients in the OM group and 40 in the MS group had a vaginal delivery (84.0% v. 87.0%, p=0.361), with 12 and 20 patients in the OM and MS groups, respectively, requiring oxytocin augmentation (p=0.023). The duration of labour was significantly shorter in the OM group, in which 78.6% of those who had a vaginal delivery achieved it within 9 hours, compared with 57.5% in the MS group (p=0.036). Overall, neonatal outcomes and need for NICU admission were similar and comparable in the two groups. On a preference scale, 43% of the women in the MS group felt positive about the intervention, compared with 92% of the women in the OM group. Conclusion. The study demonstrated a shorter latency period, less need for oxytocin augmentation and shorter duration of labour in patients who received OM. The two induction agents were similar with regard to neonatal outcomes and need for NICU admission. Both showed good safety profiles for outpatient care, although further assessment of the safety profile with larger studies will be needed. More patients felt positive about the intervention in the OM group than in the MS group