Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of the world health organization regional office for africa stepwise laboratory quality improvement process towards accreditation
Ndihokubwayo, Jean-Bosco; Maruta, Talkmore; Ndlovu, Nqobile; Moyo, Sikhulile; Yahaya, Ali Ahmed; Coulibaly, Sheick Oumar; Kasolo, Francis; Turgeon, David; Abrol, Angelii P.
  • Ndihokubwayo, Jean-Bosco; s.af
  • Maruta, Talkmore; s.af
  • Ndlovu, Nqobile; s.af
  • Moyo, Sikhulile; s.af
  • Yahaya, Ali Ahmed; s.af
  • Coulibaly, Sheick Oumar; s.af
  • Kasolo, Francis; s.af
  • Turgeon, David; s.af
  • Abrol, Angelii P; s.af
Afr. j. lab. med. (Online) ; 5(1): 1-8, 2016. ilus
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1257307
Responsible library: CG1.1
ABSTRACT

Background:

The increase in disease burden has continued to weigh upon health systems in Africa. The role of the laboratory has become increasingly critical in the improvement of health for diagnosis; management and treatment of diseases. In response; the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO AFRO) and its partners created the WHO AFRO Stepwise Laboratory (Quality) Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) program.SLIPTA implementation process WHO AFRO defined a governance structure with roles and responsibilities for six main stakeholders. Laboratories were evaluated by auditors trained and certified by the African Society for Laboratory Medicine. Laboratory performance was measured using the WHO AFRO SLIPTA scoring checklist and recognition certificates rated with 1-5 stars were issued. Preliminary

results:

By March 2015; 27 of the 47 (57%) WHO AFRO member states had appointed a SLIPTA focal point and 14 Ministers of Health had endorsed SLIPTA as the desired programme for continuous quality improvement. Ninety-eight auditors from 17 African countries; competent in the Portuguese (3); French (12) and eng (83) languages; were trained and certified. The mean score for the 159 laboratories audited between May 2013 and March 2015 was 69% (median 70%; SD 11.5; interquartile range 62-77). Of these audited laboratories; 70% achieved 55% compliance or higher (2 or more stars) and 1% scored at least 95% (5 stars). The lowest scoring sections of the WHO AFRO SLIPTA checklist were sections 6 (Internal Audit) and 10 (Corrective Action); which both had mean scores below 50%.

Conclusion:

The WHO AFRO SLIPTA is a process that countries with limited resources can adopt for effective implementation of quality management systems. Political commitment; ownership and investment in continuous quality improvement are integral components of the process
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: AIM (Africa) Main subject: World Health Organization / Quality Improvement / Accreditation / Laboratories Language: English Journal: Afr. j. lab. med. (Online) Year: 2016 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: AIM (Africa) Main subject: World Health Organization / Quality Improvement / Accreditation / Laboratories Language: English Journal: Afr. j. lab. med. (Online) Year: 2016 Type: Article