Combined Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy and Burch Colposuspension for the Treatment of Stage 3 and 4 Anterior Compartment Prolapse

ABSTRACT

Objective. To review our experience with sacrocolpopexy and Burch colposuspension for stage 3 and 4 anterior compartment prolapse. Methods. Review of 154 patient records drawn from a urogynaecological database; with stage 3 and 4 anterior compartment prolapse treated by sacrocolpopexy and Burch colposuspension. Results. The median age of the patients was 60 years and a third of them had had previous prolapse surgery. Patients presented with bladder (41) and bowel (55) symptoms; and most complained of prolapse protruding through the vaginal introitus (86). Recurrent prolapse; stage 2 - 4; occurred in 24 patients (15.6); 9.7were anterior compartment prolapses. Where mesh was omitted from the anterior vaginal wall but placed on the posterior vaginal wall; significantly more recurrent anterior compartment prolapses occurred (95confidence interval (CI) 0.2; 34.8) compared with cases where mesh was placed both anteriorly and posteriorly to the vagina. Perioperative complications occurred in 13of patients. A tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for urinary stress incontinence was done at a later stage in 8of the patients. Conclusion. Sacrocolpopexy effectively treated anterior compartment prolapse where mesh was attached to the anterior vaginal wall as well. A Burch colposuspension probably did not make a difference