Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over 70 years of age at diagnosis. Despite this fact, these patients are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As a consequence, the most appropriate regimens for these patients are controversial, and the role of single-agent or combination therapy is unclear. In this setting, a critical systematic review of RCTs in this group of patients is warranted. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of different cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for previously untreated elderly patients with advanced (stage IIIB and IV) NSCLC. To also assess the impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy on quality of life. METHODS: Search methods: We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 October 2014), EMBASE (1974 to 31 October 2014), and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to 31 October 2014). In addition, we handsearched the proceedings of major conferences, reference lists from relevant resources, and the ClinicalTrial.gov database. Selection criteria: We included only RCTs that compared non-platinum single-agent therapy versus non-platinum combination therapy, or non-platinum therapy versus platinum combination therapy in patients over 70 years of age with advanced NSCLC. We allowed inclusion of RCTs specifically designed for the elderly population and those designed for elderly subgroup analyses. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed search results, and a third review author resolved disagreements. We analyzed the following endpoints: overall survival (OS), one-year survival rate (1yOS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), major adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). MAIN RESULTS: We included 51 trials in the review: non-platinum single-agent therapy versus non-platinum combination therapy (seven trials) and non-platinum combination therapy versus platinum combination therapy (44 trials). Non-platinum single-agent versus non-platinum combination therapy Low-quality evidence suggests that these treatments have similar effects on overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.17; participants = 1062; five RCTs), 1yOS (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07; participants = 992; four RCTs), and PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.07; participants = 942; four RCTs). Non-platinum combination therapy may better improve ORR compared with non-platinum single-agent therapy (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.26; participants = 1014; five RCTs; low-quality evidence). Differences in effects on major adverse events between treatment groups were as follows: anemia: RR 1.10, 95% 0.53 to 2.31; participants = 983; four RCTs; very low-quality evidence; neutropenia: RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.65; participants = 983; four RCTs; low-quality evidence; and thrombocytopenia: RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.89; participants = 914; three RCTs; very low-quality evidence. Only two RCTs assessed quality of life; however, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of the paucity of available data. Non-platinum therapy versus platinum combination therapy Platinum combination therapy probably improves OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85; participants = 1705; 13 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence), 1yOS (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96; participants = 813; 13 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence), and ORR (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.85; participants = 1432; 11 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence) compared with non-platinum therapies. Platinum combination therapy may also improve PFS, although our confidence in this finding is limited because the quality of evidence was low (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; participants = 1273; nine RCTs). Effects on major adverse events between treatment groups were as follows: anemia: RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.70 to 3.76; participants = 1437; 11 RCTs; low-quality evidence; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.59, 95% CI 2.22 to 5.82; participants = 1260; nine RCTs; low-quality evidence; fatigue: RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.38; participants = 1150; seven RCTs; emesis: RR 3.64, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.29; participants = 1193; eight RCTs; and peripheral neuropathy: RR 7.02, 95% CI 2.42 to 20.41; participants = 776; five RCTs; low-quality evidence. Only five RCTs assessed QoL; however, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of the paucity of available data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In people over the age of 70 with advanced NSCLC who do not have significant co-morbidities, increased survival with platinum combination therapy needs to be balanced against higher risk of major adverse events when compared with non-platinum therapy. For people who are not suitable candidates for platinum treatment, we have found low-quality evidence suggesting that non-platinum combination and single-agent therapy regimens have similar effects on survival. We are uncertain as to the comparability of their adverse event profiles. Additional evidence on quality of life gathered from additional studies is needed to help inform decision making

Brazilian consensus for multimodal treatment of colorectal liver metastases. module 3: controversies and unresectable metastases / Consenso brasileiro de tratamento multidisciplinar de metástase hepática de origem colorretal módulo 3: controvérsias e metástases irressecáveis

ABSTRACT In the last module of this consensus, controversial topics were discussed. Management of the disease after progression during first line chemotherapy was the first discussion. Next, the benefits of liver resection in the presence of extra-hepatic disease were debated, as soon as, the best sequence of treatment. Conversion chemotherapy in the presence of unresectable liver disease was also discussed in this module. Lastly, the approach to the unresectable disease was also discussed, focusing in the best chemotherapy regimens and hole of chemo-embolization.

RESUMO Neste último módulo do consenso, abordou-se alguns temas controversos. O primeiro tópico discutido foi o manejo da doença após progressão na primeira linha de quimioterapia, com foco em se ainda haveria indicação cirúrgica neste cenário. A seguir, o painel debruçou-se sobre as situações de ressecção da doença hepática na presença de doença extra-hepática, assim como, qual a melhor sequência de tratamento. O tratamento de conversão para doença inicialmente irressecável também foi abordado neste módulo, incluindo as importantes definições de quando se pode esperar que a doença se torne ressecável e quais esquemas terapêuticos seriam mais efetivos à luz dos conhecimentos atuais sobre a biologia tumoral e taxas de resposta objetiva. Por último, o tratamento da doença não passível de ressecção foi discutida, focando-se nos melhores esquemas a serem empregados e seu sequenciamento, bem como o papel da quimioembolização no manejo destes pacientes.

Carcinoma metaplásico de mama: a importância da confirmação anatomopatológica / Metaplastic breast carcinoma: the importance of anatomopathologic confirmation

Objetivo: Comparar o diagnóstico inicial, geralmente a partir de serviços de patologia geral, com o laudo médico definitivo do serviço de patologia certificada. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de pacientes em uma instituição com diagnóstico final de câncer de mama metaplásico (CMM) foi realizada entre janeiro de 2008 e janeiro de 2014. Resultados: Um total de 18 pacientes com diagnóstico de CMM do sexo feminino e idade média de 49,8 anos foi reportado. O tamanho tumoral foi menor do que 3,0 cm em 52,9% das pacientes. Linfadenopatia axilar não estava presente inicialmente em 72,2% das pacientes e, em nenhum caso, foi identificada metástase a distância ao diagnóstico. Diagnóstico prévio de carcinoma ductal invasivo (CDI) foi descrito em 60% dos casos. Cerca de 80% foram tratadas com quimioterapia neoadjuvante e apresentaram progressão. Apenas um caso com diagnóstico de CMM antes do início da terapia recebeu quimioterapia neoadjuvante com platina e apresentou resposta clínica. Conclusão: Devido às características histopatológicas de triplo-negativos, o CMM pode ter sido subdiagnosticado em serviços de patologia geral. Nos casos de ausência de resposta ou progressão da doença frente ao tratamento tradicional, o diagnóstico de CMM deve ser considerado e o laudo médico deve ser revisado.

Objective: To compare the initial diagnosis, usually from community pathology services, with the final pathology report from certified pathology service. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients in an institution with final diagnosis of metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) was conducted from January 2008 to January 2014. Results: There were 18 female patients diagnosed with MBC. Median age was 49.8 years old; 52.9% of the patients had a tumor size less than 3.0 cm; 72.2% had no axillary lymphadenopathy at diagnosis. None of them had distant metastases at presentation. Initial diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) occurred in 60% of patients. Eighty percent of patients were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and presented progression. Only one case with diagnosis of MBC prior to therapy was submitted to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum-based regimen and presented clinical response. Conclusion: Due to the triple-negative histopathology features, MBC might have been underdiagnosed in community pathology services. In cases of non-response or progression of the disease regarding the traditional treatment, MBC diagnosis should be considered and the medical report must be reviewed.

Meningeal carcinomatosis in solid tumors / Carcinomatose meníngea em tumores sólidos

The involvement of the leptomeninges by metastatic tumors can be observed in solid tumors, in which case it is termed meningeal carcinomatosis (MC), and in lymphoproliferative malignant disease. It is more common in breast and lung cancer, as well as melanoma, with adenocarcinoma being the most frequent histological type. MC is usually a late event, with disseminated and progressive disease already present and, it is characterized by multifocal neurological signs and symptoms. Diagnosis is based on the evaluation of clinical presentation, cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging studies. The better systemic disease control is observed with new therapeutic agents, and the development of neuroimaging methods is responsible for the increasing incidence of such metastatic evolution. Intrathecal chemotherapy is generally the treatment of choice, although frequently palliative. Prognosis is guarded, although a higher performance status may indicate a subgroup of patients with a more favorable outcome.

O acometimento leptomeníngeo por metástases tumorais pode ocorrer em tumores sólidos, sendo chamado de carcinomatose meníngea (CM), e também em doenças linfoproliferativas. Tumores de mama, pulmão e melanoma são os principais responsáveis pelos casos, e adenocarcinoma é a histologia mais frequentemente encontrada. A CM é um evento tardio na evolução da doença e caracteriza-se por sinais e sintomas neurológicos multifocais. O diagnóstico se faz pela avaliação conjunta do quadro clínico, neuroimagem e estudo do líquido cefalorraquidiano. O maior controle da doença sistêmica obtido com as novas modalidades terapêuticas e a baixa penetração de drogas no sistema nervoso central, aliados ao desenvolvimento nos métodos de neuroimagem observado nas últimas décadas, são fatores que respondem por um aumento na incidência desta apresentação. A quimioterapia intratecal é o tratamento de escolha, porém, frequentemente paliativo. O prognóstico é reservado, sendo que o melhor performance status pode selecionar um subgrupo de pacientes com melhor evolução.

Gefitinibe no tratamento de pacientes com câncer avançado de não-pequenas células do pulmão em um programa de acesso expandido: experiência de uma única instituição / Gefitinib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated on the expanded access program: a single institution experience

Relatamos uma análise retrospectiva dos pacientes com câncer de pulmão não-pequenas células avançado tratados com gefitinib no programa de acesso expandido. Pacientes com câncer de pulmão não-pequenas células avançado e “performance status” de Karnofsky ≥ 50% foram selecionados para receber gefitinib 250 mg uma vez ao dia. Nenhum outro tratamento sistêmicoantineoplásico era permitido. De junho/2002 a abril/2003, foram incluídos 31 pacientes com idade entre 38 e 84 anos, sendo 20 homens e 11 mulheres. O “performance status” de Karnofsky mediano foi 80% e 25 pacientes tinham história de tabagismo. Trinta pacientes apresentavam estádio clínico IV e 1 paciente apresentava estádio clínico IIIB. A taxa de resposta objetiva foi de 14%. Não houve respostacompleta. Dez pacientes apresentaram doença estável por mais de 6 meses, proporcionando uma taxa de resposta mais doença estável de 50%. A sobrevida mediana livre de progressão foi de 3,6 meses, e a sobrevida global mediana foi de 4 meses. A taxa de sobrevida em um ano foi de 19%. O perfil de toxicidade em geral foi leve, com diarréia grau 1 (42%) e 2 (11%) e rash cutâneo grau 1 (16%) sendo osefeitos colaterais mais observados. Embora seja uma pequena amostra de pacientes, nossos dados são similares aos dados de estudos publicados, confirmando a eficácia e segurança do gefitinib em um grupo de pacientes previamente tratados. Neste estudo, ospacientes selecionados apresentavam apenas alguns critérios essenciais de elegibilidade, o que torna nossos dados reprodutíveis e aplicáveis aos pacientes atendidos na comunidade.