ABSTRACT
Introduction: Immunosuppressive state due to haematological malignancies and chemotherapy may cause disruption to wound healing despite optimum conventional treatment and standard wound dressing. Non-healing wounds are predisposed to infection whereas chemotherapy dose reductions or interruptions are associated with poor survival. Background: Mononuclear cells contain progenitor cells including haematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells and fibroblasts which facilitate wound healing through cytokines, growth factor secretions, cell-cell interactions and provision of extracellular matrix scaffolding. Clinical applications of autologous mononuclear cells therapy in wound healing in non-malignant patients with critical limb ischaemia have been reported with remarkable outcome. Methods: We report three patients with haematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy, who received autologous mononuclear cells implantation to treat non-healing wound after optimum conventional wound care. The sources of mononuclear cells (MNC) were from bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood (PB) and mobilised PB cells (mPB-MNC) using granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The cells were directly implanted into wound and below epidermis. Wound sizes and adverse effects from implantation were assessed at regular intervals. Results: All patients achieved wound healing within three months following autologous mononuclear cells implantation. No implantation adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: Autologous mononuclear cells therapy is a feasible alternative to conventional wound care to promote complete healing in non-healing wounds compounded by morbid factors such as haematological malignancies, chemotherapy, diabetes mellitus (DM), infections and prolonged immobility.
ABSTRACT
Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) is a disease characterised by a distinctive marker that is the Philadelphia Chromosome and an ability to transform into blast phase, which confers a poor prognosis. The median survival was reported to be between three to six months in correlation to blast phase. Extramedullary involvement with CML to sites such as pleural, meningeal and bones have been reported. We report a case of 41-year-old man who was diagnosed with CML in blast phase and presented with ascites. Ultrasound of abdomen showed coarse echotexture of liver suggestive leukaemic infiltration to the liver. The liver profile was severely deranged and associated with coagulopathy. Flow cytometry analysis of the peritoneal fluid revealed presence of myeloblasts consistent with CML in blast crisis with leukaemic ascites. Bone marrow biopsy also confirmed disease transformation. He received standard induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia with dose modifications based on liver enzymes performance. Our case highlights an unusual presentation of CML in blast crisis with leukaemic ascites and the challenges in managing cytotoxic treatments due to the liver infiltration.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteABSTRACT
To establish the benefits of immature reticulocyte fraction [IRF] measurement using an automated hematology cells analyzer over absolute neutrophil count [ANC] in predicting bone marrow recovery post induction chemotherapy. A prospective observational study was carried out in the Departments of Pathology, Medicine, and Pediatrics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Medical Center [UKMMC], Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia during a period of 19 months from April 2009 to December 2010 to assess the bone marrow recovery in patients with acute leukemia. A total of 22 patients in remission induction phases were enrolled in this study. The blood specimens were collected from day zero after chemotherapy, and every 3 days until patients recovered hematologically. All blood samples were measured for ANC and IRF using an automated hematology analyzer [Beckman-Coulter LH750]. The percentage of patients showing IRF recovery earlier than ANC recovery was 63.6% [14 out of 22 patients]. There was a significant difference in the mean number of days for IRF recovery as compared with ANC recovery [14.05 and 17.18 days], p=0.005. This study proved that IRF was more useful in predicting bone marrow recovery in a patient with acute leukemia post induction chemotherapy compared with ANC. The IRF is not affected by infection, is easily measured, and inexpensive; thus, it is a reliable parameter to evaluate bone marrow reconstitution