Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(1): 20-24, Jan.-Mar. 2010. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-578041

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate, in vitro, the effect of an oral antihistamine liquid formulation on roughness and topography of bovine enamel and the influence of exposure time on its erosive effect. Methods: Forty-one bovine enamel blocks were prepared leaving an exposed window of 0.8 mm2 Thirtynine blocks were divided into three treatment groups according to media immersion: antihistamine. formulation (Histamin ®), 0.6% citric acid (positive control), and distilled water (negative control). Before immersion of the samples, pH, titratable acidity, calcium, phosphate and fluoride contents of all media were verified. Enamel roughness was evaluated at baseline, and after 5, 15, and 30 min of immersion (9 samples per group). Two specimens from each group and exposure time, and 2 additional specimens representing baseline, were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Mann-Whitney test using the Bonferroni correction (á=0.017). Results: Specimens immersed in citric acid showed the highest roughness (P<.001). SEM images showed a progressive erosion pattern in samples immersed in citric acid and in antihistamine formulation. Conclusions: The antihistamine liquid formulation did not promote significant alterations of enamel roughness. Nevertheless, SEM demonstrated that the antihistamine eroded bovine enamel, and the erosion pattern was influenced by exposure time.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Tooth Erosion/etiology , Dental Enamel , Histamine Antagonists , In Vitro Techniques , Citric Acid/chemistry , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Surface Properties , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL