ABSTRACT
Abstract Purpose: Topical hypothermia and local ischemic preconditioning have been shown to reduce renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury individually. We examined whether combination of both strategies lessens renal I/R injury. Methods: Post right nephrectomy, 40 male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to five experimental protocols performed in the left kidney: topical hypothermia without ischemia (TH), warm ischemia (IR), ischemic preconditioning followed by warm ischemia (IPC+IR), cold ischemia (TH+IR), and ischemic preconditioning followed by cold ischemia (IPC+TH+IR). Eight randomly assigned right kidneys constituted the control group. After 240 min of reperfusion, the left kidney was retrieved to evaluate histological changes, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity. Serum was collected to evaluate urea and creatinine. Results: IPC+TH+IR group revealed no difference to any other group subjected to ischemia in relation to histological changes, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity. Creatinine was lower in IPC+TH+IR group compared with IPC+IR, but showed no difference compared to TH+IR group. Conclusions: Combination of local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and topical hypothermia conferred no protection in renal I/R injury. Moreover, local IPC solely followed by warm ischemia impaired renal function more than warm ischemia alone.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Ischemic Preconditioning/methods , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Kidney/pathology , Lipid Peroxidation , Reperfusion Injury/pathology , Reperfusion Injury/blood , Random Allocation , Rats, Wistar , Disease Models, Animal , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/chemistry , NephrectomyABSTRACT
Feridas cutâneas crônicas e complicadas são frequentemente encontradas na rotina da medicina veterinária e, muitas vezes, transformam os tratamentos em verdadeiro desafio. A eletroterapia tem sido indicada como alternativa aos tratamentos convencionais, devido à sua capacidade de promover cicatrização. O objetivo deste trabalho é relatar um ensaio experimental utilizando a eletroestimulação (ES) na cicatrização de feridas cutâneas em coelhos. Para tanto, foram utilizados 10 coelhos Nova Zelândia, machos, hígidos, submetidos à anestesia geral para a indução experimental de duas feridas cutâneas de 1cm² localizadas no dorso, caudal à borda das escápulas. As lesões foram higienizadas com solução salina 0,9%, sendo a do lado direito tratada por ES e a do lado esquerdo, como controle. Para ES utilizou-se a frequência de 60Hz, por 10 minutos a cada dois dias, sendo aplicadas quatro agulhas de acupuntura em pontos equidistantes ao redor da lesão, a 0,5cm da borda. Os animais foram divididos em dois grupos, de oito e de 15 dias, conforme o período de tratamento e avaliação macroscópica e histopatológica. Não houve diferença significativa no tempo de cicatrização das lesões tratadas com ES. Porém, apresentaram qualidade tecidual, tanto na avaliação macro quanto microscópica, superior às do grupo controle. Com isso, é possível indicar a ES como tratamento de feridas cutâneas, por ser uma técnica eficiente, de fácil aplicação e de relativo baixo custo.
Chronic skin wounds are frequently found in veterinary medicine routine and it becomes a challenge for clinicians. Sometimes the treatment routinely used end up failing. The electrotherapy has been indicated as an alternative to conventional treatments because of its ability to promote healing. The aim of this paper is to report an experimental study using electrical stimulation (ES) in wound healing in rabbits. It was evaluated 10 healthy New Zealand rabbits that were submitted to general anesthesia for resection of two wounds with 1cm² located in both sides of the back behind the scapula edge. It was determinate that the right wound would be treated by ES and the left would be used as a control, both cleaned with solution of NaCl 0,9%. The frequency used to ES was 60Hz for 10 minutes every two days, being applied by acupuncture needles in four equidistant points around the lesion, to 0.5cm from the edge. The animals were divided in one group of 15 days and another one of 8 days for treatment and macroscopic and histopathological evaluation. The results showed that the lesions treated by ES do not have significant difference in healing time. However, those treated had higher scarring macroscopic and microscopic quality than the control group. Therefore, it is possible to indicate the use of ES as a skin wounds treatment, whereas it was demonstrated to be an effective technique, easy to use and has relatively low cost.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Mouse models of emphysema are important tools for testing different therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to develop a mouse model of emphysema induced by different doses of elastase in order to produce different degrees of severity. Methods: Thirty female mice (C57BL/6) were used in this study. Different doses of porcine pancreatic elastase were administered intratracheally once a week for four weeks, as follows: 0.1 U (n=8), 0.15 U (n=7), and 0.2 U (n=7). Control mice (n=8) received 50 microL of sterile saline solution intratracheally. Lung mechanics were analyzed by plethysmography. Mean linear intercept and volume fraction occupied by collagen and elastic fibers were determined. Results: An increase in lung resistance was observed with 0.2 U of elastase [median (P-25-P75): 2.02 (1.67; 2.34) cmH2O.s/mL], as well as a decrease in tidal volume and minute ventilation. Peak expiratory flow increased significantly in the groups treated with 0.15 U and 0.2 U of elastase. Mean linear intercept was higher with 0.15 U and 0.2 U of elastase, with destruction of alveolar walls [median (P-25-P75): 30.31 (26.65-43.13) microm and 49.49 (31.67-57.71) microm respectively]. The volume fraction occupied by collagen and elastic fibers was lower in the group receiving 0.2 U of elastase. Conclusion: Four intratracheal instillations of 0.2 U of elastase once a week induced changes in lung function and histology, producing an experimental model of severe pulmonary emphysema, whereas 0.15 U resulted in only histological changes.