ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the relationship of WT1 and VEGF expression with angiogenesis in bone marrow biopsies of multiple myeloma patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>VEGF, WT1 expression and microvessel density (MVD) of 62 cases of multiple myeloma and 10 normal bone marrow tissue were detected by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry SP method.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Microvessel density (MVD) of the control group was (45±6)/visual field, and while MVD of the multiple myeloma group was (84±26)/sight, and statistical analysis showed that MVD in multiple myeloma group was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05); in 62 cases of multiple myeloma the VEGF positive rate was 51.6% (32/62), and MVD in VEGF-positive group was significantly higher than that in the negative group (P<0.05). WT1 positive rate was 30.6% (19/62), and MVD in WT1-positive group was significantly higher than that in the negative group (P<0.05). And statistical analysis showed that WT1 expression significantly correlated with VEGF expression (P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>WT1 high expression of multiple myeloma bone tissue can up-regulate VEGF expression and promote angiogenesis.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Biopsy , Bone Marrow , Multiple Myeloma , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , WT1 ProteinsABSTRACT
Objective To determine the value of Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)technique on diagnosis of adrenal medulla hyperplasia model rats confirmed by pathology study.Methods Sixty male SD rats were divided into 6 groups randomly,10 rats in each group.As experiment group,A,B,C groups were subcutaneously injected with reserpine(0.4 mg?kg~(-1)?d~(-1))from the beginning to 40,60,80 days respectively.As compare,the control groups(a,b,c group)were only injected with sodium chloride simultaneously.MRI technique and pathology study were performed for all the subjects on 40,60,and 80 days respectively.Results The percent of medulla were higher in B and C groups than that in b and c groups respectively[(34.3?5.8)% vs.(25.7?8.9)%,t=2.462,P