ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the prognostic factors of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) after radical resection with different surgical approaches.Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 442 patients who were admitted to Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from February 2003 to July 2011 were collected. There were 362 males and 80 females, aged from 21 to 85 years, with a median age of 64 years. Patients underwent radical resection of AEG. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) follow-up; (3) progrostic factors analysis of AEG after radical resection; (4) survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach; (5) survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach; (6) survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ type AEG; (7) survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival of patients up to June 2018. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and draw survival curves, and Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the COX proportional hazard model. Results:(1) Surgical situations: 442 patients underwent radical resection of AEG, including 204 via abdominal approach and 238 via thoracoabdominal approach. There were 391 patients with D 2 lymphadenectomy and 51 with D 2+ lymphadenectomy. (2) Follow-up: 442 patients were followed up for 8-162 months, with a median follow-up time of 37 months. All the 442 patients survived for 2-156 months, with a median survival time of 31 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were 79.2%, 42.0%, 30.0%, respectively. (3) Prognostic factors analysis of AEG after radical resection: results of univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, Lauren type, pathological T staging, pathological N staging, pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration were related factors for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG ( χ2=4.028, 4.885, 19.435, 17.014, 34.449, 9.707, 11.866, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration were independent influencing fators for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG ( hazard ratio=1.255, 0.486, 1.454, 95% confidence interval: 1.024-1.539, 0.325-0.728, 1.096-1.928, P<0.05). (4) Survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach: of the 204 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 83.6%, 50.4%, 37.8% for 121 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, respectively, versus 72.0%, 39.3%, 31.8% for 83 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=1.854, P>0.05). (5) Survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach: of the 238 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 79.6%, 38.8%, 23.8% for 183 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, respectively, versus 79.1%, 37.6%, 29.3% for 55 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=0.215, P>0.05). (6) Survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ AEG: of the 304 patients with Siewert typeⅡAEG, the postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 83.6%, 50.4%, 37.8% for 121 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, respectively, versus 79.6%, 38.8%, 23.8% for 183 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=2.406, P>0.05). (7) Survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG: of the 138 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, the postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 72.0%, 39.3%, 31.8% for 83 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, respectively, versus 79.1%, 37.6%, 29.3% for 55 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=0.640, P>0.05). Conclusions:Pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration are independent fators for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG. Siewert types and surgical approach are not related factors for prognosis of patients after radical resection of AEG. There is no significant difference in the survival between patients with different Siewert types of AEG undergoing radical resection via different surgical approaches.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of gastric stump cancer (GSC). Meth-ods: Clinicopathological data of 105 patients diagnosed with GSC at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between May 2004 and July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Comparison of clinicopathological features of GSC-B and GSC-M: the average ages of the patients in the GSC-B and GSC-M groups were (63.22±8.95) and (58.93±10.06) years, respectively, and the male: fe-male ratios in the GSC-B and GSC-M groups were 17.5:1.0 and 2.6:1.0, respectively. The time intervals from initial surgery to the diag-nosis of GSC in the two groups were (390.95±95.18) and (64.53±73.15) months, respectively; the numbers of lymph nodes harvested in the GSC-B and GSC-M groups were 17.6±12.5 and 6.2±6.5, respectively; and the ratios of well differentiation to poor differentiation in the GSC-B and GSC-M groups were 0.89:1 and 0.20:1, respectively. The differences between all the above factors were statistically significant (P<0.05). Comparison of clinicopathological features of the anastomotic site group and non-anastomotic site group: there was no statistical difference between all the clinicopathological features (P>0.05). Univariate analysis showed that distant metastasis and R0 resection were prognostic factors in the patients with GSC. Multivariate analysis showed that R0 resection was an independent prognostic factor in the patients with GSC. Conclusions: The clinicopathological features of patients in the GSC-B and GSC-M groups were different. Patients with GSC would not benefit from palliative surgery if they could not receive radical surgery. R0 resection is an independent prognostic factor for patients with GSC.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the potential clinical value of standardized procedures of fine lymph node sorting from gastric can-cer samples after curative resection. Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2017, 727 gastric cancer patients who under- went R0 resection in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively included and assigned to either the fine lymph node sorting group or regional lymph node sorting group in accordance with the lymph node sorting methods from the tumor samples of all patients. Both the numbers of examined lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes were compared between the two groups. Additionally, correlation analyses were performed between the numbers of examined lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes in the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in sex, age, or tumor size between the two groups (P>0.05), indi-cating that there was comparability between the two groups. The number of examined lymph nodes in the fine lymph node sorting group was significantly higher than that in the regional lymph node sorting group (P<0.001). Furthermore, the number of examined lymph nodes in the fine lymph node sorting group was much higher than that in the regional lymph node sorting group with the same pT, pN, or pTNM stage (P<0.001). The number of metastatic lymph nodes in the fine lymph node sorting group was significantly higher than that in the regional lymph node sorting group (P<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the numbers of ex-amined lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes in both groups (fine lymph node sorting group r=0.181, P=0.023; regional lymph node sorting group r=0.227, P<0.001). Additionally, the correlation coefficient between the numbers of examined lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes in the fine lymph node sorting group was weaker than that in the regional lymph node sorting group. Conclu-sions: The standard procedures of fine lymph node sorting from tumor samples of gastric cancer may increase the number of exam-ined lymph nodes, accurately provide the postoperative pN stage, reduce the stage migration, and should be applied in clinical stan-dardization.
ABSTRACT
Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer is of great significance for choosing an optimal therapeutic schedule and for evaluating the prognosis. Accurate preoperative preparation can avoid unnecessary treatment and help with selecting optimal treat-ment modalities. In recent years, the preoperative staging of gastric cancer has been greatly improved owing to the use of diagnostic methods such as endoscopic ultrasonography, multi-slice spiral computed tomography, positron emission computed tomography, and staging laparoscopy, among other such modalities. However, all diagnostic methods are associated with advantages and limitations. Thus, a combination of various diagnostic modalities is essential for accurate preoperative staging. This paper reviews the research progress in the aforementioned diagnostic methods for preoperative staging.
ABSTRACT
So far, D2 lymphadenectomy has been recognized as the key one of the procedures in curative resection for gastric cancer. In summary, the standardized implementation of D2 lymphadenectomy can contribute to both surgical quality and patients′ prognosis. Lymph node dissection, as an important basis for local surgical treatment of gastric cancer, involves certain technical risks due to complex adjacent relationship and anatomical variation of organs or blood vessels, and so on. There is a certain incidence of side injuries in D2 lymphadenectomy for a surgeon, regardless of the experience of learning curve. Complying with specification of surgical procedures and summarizing the vital points of lymph node dissection in each curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer is the principal method to reduce or avoid the occurrence of relevant complications after surgery.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigated the characteristics and regularity of lymph node metastasis around gastric cancer in order to provide reference for standardized and optimal surgical treatment.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective case series study was carried out on 1456 patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgical treatment at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from March 2003 to August 2011. The number of harvested lymph node and metastasis status of various lymph node station were determined by routine pathological examination of specimens, including resected gastric tissue and dissected lymph node tissue, according to the 13th version of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines. Tumor T, N and M staging was performed to evaluate lymphatic metastasis status of different locations of gastric cancer according to the TNM staging criteria of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The influence of gender, age, tumor diameter, Borrmann type, T staging and M staging, tumor differentiation degree, invasion of vessels, lymphatic vessels and nerves, radical surgical degree and other clinical factors on lymph node metastasis was analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 1062 cases(72.9%) had lymph node metastasis in the 1456 patients with gastric cancer. A total of 9766 lymph nodes were positive for metastasis. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 11 of 44 (25.0%) patients with early gastric cancer and in 1051 of 1412 (74.4%) patients with advanced gastric cancer. The largest number of lymph node metastases was found in No.3 station [653 cases (44.8%)], followed by No.6 [437 cases(30.0%)], No.7 [345 cases (23.7%)], No.1 [304 cases (20.9%)], No.4sb [290 cases (19.9%)]. No.14v lymph node metastasis was observed in 23 cases, of whom No.6 (16 cases, 69.6%), No.8a (15 cases, 65.2%) and No.3 (12 cases, 52.2%) developed simultaneous metastasis. As for different locations of gastric cancer, stations with more lymph node metastasis in 309 patients with proximal gastric cancer were No.3 (133 cases, 43.0%), No.1 (96 cases, 31.1%), No.2 (90 cases, 29.1%) and No.7 (89 cases, 28.8%); in 144 patients with middle gastric cancer were No.3 (68 cases, 47.2%), No.6 (50 cases, 34.7%), No.7 (40 cases, 27.8%) and No.4sb (38 cases, 26.4%); in 700 patients with distal gastric cancer were No.3(287 cases, 41.0%), No.6 (265 cases, 37.8%), No.4sb (138 cases, 19.7%) and No.8a (138 cases, 19.7%); in 303 cases with diffuse-type gastric cancer were No.3 (165 cases, 54.4%), No.6 (100 cases, 33.0%), No.7 (88 cases, 29.0%), No.1 (84 cases, 27.7%) and No.4sb (72 cases, 23.8%). The incidence of lymph node skip metastasis was 7.2% (105/1456) in whole group. Positive lymph node metastasis was associated with tumor size (RR=2.016, 95%CI: 1.550-2.621, P=0.000), tumor differentiation(RR=1.631, 95%CI:1.405-1.894, P=0.000), tumor T staging (RR=1.886, 95%CI: 1.629-2.184, P=0.000), tumor M staging (RR=3.671, 95%CI:1.265-10.660, P=0.017) and radical surgery(RR=3.819, 95%CI: 2.023-7.207, P=0.000).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The main direction of peripheral lymph node drainage in gastric cancer is lesser curvature, and then the left gastric artery, the common hepatic artery and the peripheral lymph nodes of the celiac axis, and finally the peripheral lymph nodes of the abdominal aorta. Therefore the No.6 station lymph node adjacent to the perigastric area, the No.7, No.8 and No.9 lymph nodes should be the focus of the radical surgical dissection of gastric cancer. Tumor size, differentiation degree, invasion depth and distant metastasis have significant association with lymph node metastasis. For patients with adverse factors, radical surgery is necessary to ensure efficacy.</p>
ABSTRACT
So far, the category based on the number of metastatic lymph nodes (eg. pN stage) has been demonstrated to be the optimal staging of lymph node metastasis after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Although pN stage has been updating since 1992, it has been still controversial to guarantee the acquisition for the accurate information of lymph node metastasis from gastric cancer. Generally, stage migration of lymph node metastasis means that number of metastatic lymph node is positively correlated with the extent of lymphadenectomy, and with the expansion of lymphadenectomy extent, occurrence of stage migration of lymph node metastasis may decrease gradually or be avoided (Will-Roger phenomena). Stage migration of lymph node metastasis is considered to have a significant impact on the pathologic stage, prognostic evaluation and strategy formulation of adjuvant therapy. Actually, stage migration of lymph node metastasis may be induced by individual difference in patients, disease stage, special biological behaviors of tumor, extent of lymphadenectomy, procedures of lymph node examination and so on, which may undermine the accurate staging of lymph node metastasis from gastric cancer in clinic. The specification procedures for lymph node examination following the radical lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer are not only the necessary method to figure out the comprehensive information of lymph node metastasis from patients but also the essential evidence to embody the high quality of curative gastrectomy for patients, which may provide the optima database for the further precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the risk factor of perioperative complication in gastric cancer patients with radical therapy and its influence on prognosis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical, pathological and follow-up data of 1 148 gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy at Tianjin Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital between January 2009 and August 2011 were retrospectively collected. Pearson 2 test and Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factor of perioperative complication. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of perioperative complications on the prognosis in patients after radical gastrectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was applied to calculate the survival.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of 1 148 patients, 851 were male, 297 were female, age ranged from 19 to 89 (average 59.9) years. Perioperative complication occurred in 312 cases (27.2%), including 140 cases of pulmonary infection and 53 cases of abdominal infection. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that ≥65 years old (OR:0.736, 95%CI: 0.558 to 0.971, P=0.030), serum albumin less than 35 g/L(OR:2.626, 95%CI: 1.479 to 4.665, P=0.001), Borrmann type IIII((OR: 0.748, 95%CI: 0.610 to 0.917, P=0.005), tumor site at upper 1/3 of stomach (OR:1.326, 95%CI:1.167 to 1.506, P=0.000), combined organ resection(OR:0.624, 95%CI:0.428 to 0.909, P=0.014) were independent risk factors of perioperative complication. Tumor site at upper 1/3 of stomach (OR:1.649, 95%CI: 1.368 to 1.988, P=0.000), ≥65 years old (OR:0.548, 95%CI:0.379 to 0.792, P=0.001), without intraoperative chemotherapy (OR:1.671, 95%CI:1.146 to 2.437, P=0.008) were independent risk factors of perioperative pulmonary infection; Borrmann type IIII((OR:0.576, 95%CI:0.369 to 0.900, P=0.015), with intraoperative chemotherapy (OR:0.431, 95%CI:0.230 to 0.810, P=0.009), intraoperative blood loss ≥400 ml(OR:0.411, 95%CI:0.176 to 0.959, P=0.040) and combined organ resection (OR:0.412, 95%CI:0.215 to 0.789, P=0.008) were independent risk factors of perioperative intraperitoneal infection. Cox regression analysis revealed that without intraoperative chemotherapy, proximal subtotal or total gastrectomy, TNM stage III(, N3 stage lymph node metastasis, positive soft tissue outside lymph node, combined organ resection and organ failure were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients after radical resection (all P<0.05), however the perioperative complication was not independent risk factor affecting the prognosis (P=0.259). The median survival time was 35 months, and 5-year survival rate was around 38.7%. The median survival time of gastric cancer patients with operative complications and without complications were 28.0 and 36.5 months, and the 5-year survival rates were 37.2% and 39.3%, whose difference was not statistically significant (P=0.259).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>There is a higher risk of perioperative complication in those gastric cancer patients with old age, preoperative low serum albumin level, tumor site at upper 1/3 of stomach, Borrmann type IIII(, intraoperative combined organ resection, while the perioperative complication has no significant effects on the long-term survival.</p>
ABSTRACT
Gastric cancer is one of the most important diseases that endangers people's health. Beside gastric adenocarcinoma, gastric carcinoma also includes the following types: adenosquamous carcinoma, squamous carcinoma, gastric neuroendocrine tumor, gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma, AFP-producing gastric cancer, EBV-associated gastric cancer, lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, undifferentiated-type gastric cancer, gastric carcinosarcoma and so on. The adenosquamous carcinoma, squamous carcinoma of stomach, gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma, AFP-producing gastric cancer and gastric carcinosarcoma mainly occurred in old men, while the linitisplastica gastric cancer was common in young women. It refers to the gastric cancers that are clinically rare and have lower incidence, unique histological and pathological features, however, without obviously clinical manifestations. The clinically uncommon gastric cancers are easy to be misdiagnosed or missed, and further to miss the optimal opportunity for treatment due to the unclearly specific pathogenesis and disease progression. With the development of studies on the clinically uncommon gastric carcinoma, although people have a further knowledge of its pathologic features, methods of diagnosis and treatment, the diagnosis and treatment standards for the clinically uncommon gastric cancer has not yet been established and unified. The therapeutic principle of the clinically uncommon gastric cancers is also the radical surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy as the main comprehensive treatment supplemented by individualized treatment. With lucubrating the pathogenesis of them, specific diagnostic methods and treatment measures are new hope for improving the diagnosis and treatment of the clinically uncommon gastric cancers. So, the further researches on the clinically uncommon gastric cancers and exploring their etiology, pathogenesis, histological and pathological features have important significance to their diagnosis and treatment. This article makes a summary of the clinically uncommon gastric cancers with the aspects of epidemiology, histology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, to provide reference to clinical diagnosis and scientific studies.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 5 562 patients with gastric neoplasm were admitted in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2001 to January 2011. Among them 42 patients were diagnosed as primary gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma, accounting for 0.76% of all the patients. The clinicopathological and follow-up data of these 42 patients with primary gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed, and Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of gastric adenocarcinoma squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among above 42 patients, 32 were male and 10 were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.2/1.0 and the average age was 63 years (range: 46 to 77 years). Five patients (11.9%) were confirmed as adenosquamous cell carcinoma by preoperative pathological examination, while other 37 patients were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma preoperatively. According to the 7th edition AJCC TNM classification system for gastric adenocarcinoma, 5 patients (11.9%) were in stage II(, 30 patients (71.4%) in stage III( and 7 patients (16.7%) in stage IIII(. The maximum tumor diameter was > 5 cm in 18 patients (42.9%). Borrmann type III(-IIII( was found in 29 patients (69.0%), and poorly differentiated (or undifferentiated) tumor was found in 32 patients (76.2%). Radical operations were performed in 31 patients (73.8%), the reasons of non radical operations included infiltration of pancreas in 3 patients, infiltration of radices mesocili transvers in 1 patient and classification of stage IIII( in 7 patients. Lymph node dissection was performed in 37 patients, 83.8% of them (31/37) was found with lymphatic metastases. Twenty-five patients received adjuvant chemotherapy except for 7 patients in stage IIII( and 10 patients who refused adjuvant chemotherapy. All the patients had an average survival time of 36.4 months and median survival time of 28.0 months, and the overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 82.2%, 42.3% and 18.2% respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size (χ=4.039, P=0.044), Borrmann type (χ=18.728, P=0.000), tumor differentiation (χ=19.612, P=0.000), radical gastectomy (χ=41.452, P=0.000), lymph node metastasis (χ=9.689, P=0.002) and clinical stage (χ=26.277, P=0.000) were associated with postoperative survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor differentiation (HR=10.560, 95%CI:2.263-49.281, P=0.003), radical gastrectomy (HR=4.309, 95%CI:1.311-14.168, P=0.016) and clinical stage (HR=2.392, 95%CI:1.022-5.600, P=0.044) were independent prognosis factors.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Primary gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma is rare with poor prognosis. Radical gastrectomy is recommended. Tumor differentiation, radical gastrectomy and clinical stage are important indicators to evaluate prognosis of primary gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma.</p>
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma , Diagnosis , Mortality , Pathology , Therapeutics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Diagnosis , Mortality , Pathology , Therapeutics , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Gastrectomy , Methods , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms , Diagnosis , Mortality , Pathology , Therapeutics , Survival RateABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the factors affecting survival rate in gastric cancer patients with lung metastasis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 64 gastric cancer patients with lung metastasis treated at the Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from January 1995 to December 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. The survival rate was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to find the factors affecting survival rate using Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The median survival time was 7 months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 32.8%, 18.8% and 7.8% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that primary tumor location, type of lung metastasis, lung metastasis combined with other distant metastasis and chemotherapy were significant factors for prognosis (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that bilateral lung metastasis(HR=2.093, 95% CI: 1.092-4.014, P=0.026) and lung metastasis combined with other distant metastasis (HR=2.433, 95% CI: 1.359-4.358, P=0.003) were independent risk prognostic factors, while chemotherapy was independent protective factor(HR=0.387, 95% CI: 0.211-0.710, P=0.002).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Prognosis of gastric cancer patients with lung metastasis is quite poor, especially those with bilateral lung involvement and extra-pulmonary metastasis. Systemic chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of these patients.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Lung Neoplasms , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms , Survival RateABSTRACT
Lymph node metastasis from gastric cancer is one of the most important events in the progress of disease, which may reflect the disease situation and contribute to evaluate accurately prognosis. Although the detailed mechanism of lymph node metastasis from gastric cancer has not been clearly elucidated, nodal metastasis comprise of a series of events involving the alterations of tumor biological characteristics, including changes of cancer cell proliferation, invasion, chemotaxis, and pathway of lymphatic drainage. As we know, assessment of lymph node metastatic status is significantly associated with both therapeutic strategy and prognostic prediction, It is controversial to adopt the optimal category of lymph node metastasis in clinical practice. Category based on the number of lymph node metastasis (e.g. N stage of UICC TNM classification) is considered as a prominent variable to apply for gastric cancer worldwide, nevertheless, category based on extent of lymph node metastasis (e.g. N stage of JGCA classification) is capable of contributing to the appropriate surgical procedure for patients. It has not reached a consensus for the assessment impacts of several special variables on prognostic evaluation in gastric cancer, including nodal micrometastasis, isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in lymph nodes, and skipping metastasis of lymph nodes, which needs further investigations to determining the application values in gastric cancer.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cell Proliferation , Lymph Nodes , Pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Micrometastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms , PathologyABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To elucidate the current diagnosis and treatment status of gastric cancer in the Chinese population based on three high volume databases.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical and pathological data of patients who underwent gastric cancer resection with complete follow-up information between January 2000 and December 2012 from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic risk factors were analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 8 338 cases were enrolled into the study, including 2 977 cases (35.7%) from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 3 043 cases (36.5%) from The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and 2 318 cases (27.8%) from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital. There were 5 852 male cases and 2 486 female cases with a ratio of 2.4 to 1.0. The age of patients was from 15 to 89 years old (median 59 years old). The ratio of early gastric cancer (T1NanyM0) was 11.5% (956/8 338). There were 2 226 gastric cancer cases (26.7%) originating from the fundus and cardiac region, 1 637 cases (19.6%) from the body, 3739 (44.9%) cases from the antrum, and 736 cases (8.8%) from the whole stomach. The median maximal tumor diameter was (4.5 ± 2.8) cm. Based on the Lauren classification, 3 448 cases (41.4%) were intestinal type and 4 890 cases (58.6%) diffuse type. A total of 1 975 cases (23.7%) and 6 363 cases (76.3%) underwent complete and subtotal gastrectomy respectively. The majority of patients (7 707 cases, 92.4%) underwent radical gastric resection, while 631 cases (7.6%) palliative resection. According to AJCC/UICC seventh edition of gastric cancer TNM staging system, 802 patients (9.6%) were stage I(A, 735 patients (8.8%) stage I(B, 695 patients (8.3%) stage II(A, 1 507 patients (18.1%) stage II(B, 1 247 patients (15.0%) stage III(A, 1 342 patients (16.1%) stage III(B, 1 583 patients (19.0%) stage III (C and 427 patients (5.1%) stage IIII(. The average number of retrieved lymph node was 21.0 ± 13.1, in which 5 761 patients (69.1%) had more than 15 retrieved lymph nodes. The overall 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 83.0%, 56.8%, 49.1% and 43.0% respectively. For patients receiving radical resection, the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 84.9%, 59.5%, 51.7% and 45.3% respectively. The overall 5-year survival rates for different stages were as follows: stage I(A 93.8%, stage I(B 80.8%, stage II(A 70.8%, stage II(B 59.6%, stage III(A 44.4%, stage III(B 32.9%, stage III(C 18.9% and stage IIII( 10.2%. Cox regression model showed that age, tumor site, tumor size, Lauren type, T staging, N staging, M staging and number of retrieved lymph nodes were independent factors affecting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients (P=0.000).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Retrospective study on these domestic three high volume databases demonstrates the clinical and pathological characteristics of gastric cancer based on Chinese population, which is expected to stand as a ground of basic data for future clinical research.</p>
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , China , Databases, Factual , Gastrectomy , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms , Diagnosis , General Surgery , Survival RateABSTRACT
Lymph node metastasis is one of the important factors influencing the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Accurate and reasonable lymph node staging is greatly significant in evaluating the course of the disease, in estimating the prognosis, and in making a reasonable treatment plan. Local and international research institutions recently found that new staging methods for lymph nodes associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer (e.g., metastastic lymph nodes ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes, negative lymph node count, and lymph node micrometastasis) can also predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. In this paper, the development history, current status of lymph node staging of gastric cancer, and research progress on the new staging methods for lymph nodes as-sociated with the prognosis of gastric cancer are reviewed.
ABSTRACT
The mechanism of gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. The diagnosis and treatment of GC undergo rapid development, but the prognosis of the patients remains dismal. The key procedure to improve overall survival is early detection and treatment. However, classic tumor markers have several limitations in clinical practice because of their low sensitivity and specificity. Given the expansion of high throughput technologies, investigators have attained considerable progress in obtaining the benefits of molecular biomarkers through genomics and proteomics analysis. These findings provide new directions for the diagnosis and treatment of early-stage GC. Markers from body fluids, which can be easily obtained , are increasingly gaining attention. This article summarizes the progress of the investigation of molecular biomarkers in early GC using body fluids.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the association of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) with survival of gastric cancer after surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1 000 gastric cancer patients, including 738 non-transfused (73.8%) and 262 transfused (26.2%) cases. A one to one match was created using propensity score analysis, except preoperative hemoglobin level and operative blood loss. The survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival model.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The 5-year survival rate of the 1 000 cases of gastric cancer patients was 39.9%. Before matching, there was a significant difference between transfused group (33.6%) and non-transfused group (49.1%, P<0.005). Univariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, hemoglobin level, albumin level, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymph node dissection, surgery mode, adjuvant chemotherapy, blood loss and blood transfusion during perioperative period were associated with prognosis in the gastric cancer patients (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymph node dissection, chemotherapy and perioperative blood transfusion were independent prognostic factors in gastric cancer (all P<0.05). After matching, the 5-year survival rate of the 262 non-transfused patients was 37.7%, while that of the 262 transfused patients was 33.6% (P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Perioperative blood transfusion has no significant effect on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Analysis of Variance , Blood Transfusion , Mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Perioperative Period , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms , Mortality , Pathology , General Surgery , Survival RateABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the clinicopathological features of signet ring cell gastric carcinoma (SRCC) with those of non-signet ring cell cancers and explore the prognostic factors of signet ring cell gastric carcinoma.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1447 gastric cancer patients, including gastric signet ring cell and non-signet ring cell cancers. Their clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival data were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The differences in the age, sex, tumor location, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM classification and surgical type were significant between gastric signet ring cell and non-signet ring cell gastric carcinomas. The 5-year survival rate of the patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma was 29.6%, while that of the non-signet ring cell cancers was 42.9% (P < 0.05). The 5-year survival rate for each stage of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and non-signet ring cell cancers was 71.0% and 79.3% for stage I, 45.6% and 58.3% for stage II, 16.9% and 29.2% for stage III, and 6.0% and 11.9% for stage IV cases, respectively, with a significant difference only between stages III and IV cancers (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, T stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for signet ring cell gastric carcinoma.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The signet ring cell gastric carcinoma has unique clinicopathological features compared with non-signet ring cell carcinoma. Early detection and treatment can improve the prognosis for patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell , Diagnosis , Pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms , Survival RateABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the value of D2+ lymph node dissection for patients with distal advanced gastric cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinicopathological data of 305 cases with distal advanced gastric cancer receiving D2+(n=68) or D2(n=237) lymph node dissection in the Tianjin Cancer Hospital from January 2003 to December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. The overall 5-year survival rate between the 2 groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The median survival was 36 months and the 5-year overall survival rate was 40.3% in all patients. The 5-year overall survival rates in the D2+ and D2 groups were 50.4% and 37.4% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.049). In multivariate prognostic analysis however, the extent of lymph node dissection was not identified as an independent prognostic factor(P=0.174). Subgroup analysis showed that 5-year survival rate of D2+ group was significantly higher as compared to D2 group for the following subgroups: maximum diameter of tumor larger than 4 cm(43.9% vs. 27.0%), Borrmann type III(-IIII((55.5% vs. 30.1%), poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumor (49.8% vs. 37.0%), T4 stage (47.8% vs. 31.0%), N2 stage (53.3% vs. 13.9%), N3 stage (20.0% vs. 9.6%) and positive No.6 lymph nodes (33.1% vs. 16.0%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Compared with D2 lymph node dissection, D2+ lymph node dissection may benefit some patients with large, poorly differentiated, or late-stage tumor.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms , Survival RateABSTRACT
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Most of GISTs are characterized by mutation in the c-kit or PDGFR-α genes. In recent years, detection of gene mutation in GISTs has been widely used. In addition to the contribution to the diagnosis of difficult cases, such detection also has important value in predicting the efficacy of therapeutic drugs targeting, guiding clinical treatment and evaluating the prognosis of patients. In a word, gene mutation detection should be considered as the important standard for exact diagnosis and treatment of GISTs.
Subject(s)
Humans , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Mutation , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaABSTRACT
Objective:The characteristics of lymph node metastasis were investigated to guide the range of lymph node dissection during the radical operation of distal gastric cancer. Methods:The clinical data of 773 patients with distal gastric cancer who under-went radical distal subtotal gastrectomy at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between February 2010 and September 2014 were reviewed and analyzed to infer the potential clinical mechanisms of lymph node metastasis. Results:Among the included patients, 423 (54.72%) had lymph node metastasis. The proportion of metastasis in the patients from the highest to the lowest rate was observed in group NO. 6, 3, 4sb, and 5 lymph nodes. The metastasis rates of the N1 lymph nodes from the highest to the low-est were observed in group NO. 3, 6, 5, and 4d lymph nodes, whereas those of the N2 lymph nodes occurred in group NO. 8a, 7, and 1 lymph nodes. Group NO. 8a lymph node with skipped metastasis was observed in 50.68%of the patients. Conclusion:During radical distal gastric cancer surgery, attention should be given to the possibility of metastasis in group NO. 8a lymph node. Appropriate exten-sion of the lymph node dissection should be conducted when necessary.