Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology ; (12): 15-18, 2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-295614

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening program and to provide evidence for designing a cervical cancer screening algorithm in high risk areas of existing low-resource settings to reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Women in Yangcheng county, Shanxi province were screened with VILI, colposcopy, liquid-based cytology test and human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA test. The efficacy of different screening tests was compared by Youden's index based on the pathology as the gold standard.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the population being screened, the mean age was 40.80 +/- 10.75 years old. Based on pathological findings, 4.35% (32/735) of the subjects had >or= CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) II. The sensitivity and specificity for the VILI test (>or= positive) were 53.13 and 82.19, while 56.25 and 79.09 were for colposcopy (>or= low grade dysplasia) respectively. Comparing by the Youden's indexs, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between VILI and colposcopy. However, statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) was found between VILI and liquid-based cytology test and HPV DNA test. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) found between the experienced doctors and the newly-trained doctors working in the field station.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>With low sensitivity when using microscope but low cost of equipments, VILI can be one of the primary screening tests in China's rural area with low-resource settings if the screening frequency is to be increased.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Diagnosis , Epidemiology , China , Epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Economics , Methods , Health Resources , Incidence , Iodides , Program Evaluation , Rural Health , Sensitivity and Specificity , Socioeconomic Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Diagnosis , Epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL