ABSTRACT
Resumo Fundamentos: Pacientes pré-diabéticos têm alto risco de doenças cardiovasculares e complicações microvasculares e macrovasculares. O Jejum Intermitente (JI) e a dieta restrita em carboidratos (dieta low-carb, DLC) são estratégias dietéticas promissoras nesse grupo. Objetivos: Analisar os benefícios da combinação do JI com DLC sobre desfechos microvasculares e macrovasculares em pacientes pré-diabéticos. Métodos: O estudo incluiu 485 pacientes pré-diabéticos sem história de doença cardiovascular. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: grupo I (n = 240) submetidos ao JI (16 horas de JI, F 3-4 dias por semana) combinado com DLC (<130 g de carboidratos por dia), e grupo II (n = 245) que consumiram alimentos à vontade (grupo controle). Os dois grupos foram acompanhados por dois anos para avaliação de complicações macrovasculares e microvasculares. Um valor p < 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados: Houve uma redução significativa no peso corporal, índice de massa corporal, porcentagem de gordura corporal e hemoglobina glicada no grupo I. A incidência de progressão de pré-diabetes para diabetes foi significativamente menor no grupo I (2,1%) que no grupo II (6,9%) (p = 0,010). Ainda, um aumento significativo na incidência de complicações microvasculares e macrovasculares foi observado no grupo II, incluindo retinopatia, neuropatia e angina instável. A análise de regressão multivariada revelou que peso corporal aumentado, e níveis elevados de glicemia de jejum, hemoglobina glicada e lipoproteína de baixa densidade foram fatores de risco independentes de desfechos microvasculares e macrovasculares. Conclusões: Em pacientes pré-diabéticos, o JI, combinado com DLC, associou-se com menor progressão para diabetes mellitus e menor incidência de complicações microvasculares e macrovasculares.
Abstract Background: Prediabetic patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases and the development of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Intermittent fasting (IF) and low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) are promising dietary plans. Objectives: Our aims to analyze the benefits of IF combined with LCD on microvascular and macrovascular outcomes in prediabetic patients. Methods: The study included 485 prediabetic patients with no history of cardiovascular diseases divided into group I: (n = 240 patients) who underwent IF (16 h IF 3-4 days per week) combined with LCD (<130 g of carbohydrate per day), and group II: (n = 245 patients) with ad libitum calorie intake. The two groups were followed-up for two years for assessment of micro and macrovascular complications. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: There was a significant reduction in body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, body fat percentage and glycated hemoglobin in group I. The incidence of progression from prediabetes to diabetes was significantly lower in group I (2.1% vs. 6.9% in group II, p = 0.010). In addition, a significant increase in the incidence of microvascular and macrovascular complications was observed in group II, including retinopathy, neuropathy and unstable angina. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that increased body weight, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin and low-density lipoprotein were independent risk factors impacting microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Conclusions: In prediabetic patients, IF, combined with LCD, was associated with lower progression to diabetes mellitus and lower incidence of microvascular and macrovascular complications.
ABSTRACT
Resumo Fundamento: O desconhecimento do paciente sobre o infarto agudo do miocárdio, suas complicações e os benefícios da revascularização precoce é um ponto crucial na determinação dos desfechos. Além disso, a relação entre fatores socioeconômicos e apresentação do paciente à intervenção coronária percutânea primária (ICPP) não foi totalmente estudada. Objetivos: Nosso objetivo foi investigar se o desconhecimento do paciente e outros fatores socioeconômicos impactam na apresentação do paciente à ICPP. Métodos: O estudo compreendeu 570 pacientes com infarto agudo do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMCSST) revascularizados por ICPP. Os pacientes foram classificados em dois grupos de acordo com o tempo total de isquemia (tempo desde o início dos sintomas do IAMCSST até a dilatação com balão); grupo I: Pacientes com apresentação precoce (1-12 horas). Grupo II: Pacientes com apresentação tardia (>12-24 horas). Fatores socioeconômicos, desfechos clínicos incluindo mortalidade e eventos cardíacos adversos maiores (ECAM) foram avaliados em cada grupo. O valor de p < 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significante. Resultados: Existem diferentes fatores socioeconômicos que afetam a apresentação do paciente à ICPP. A análise de regressão multivariada identificou os preditores socioeconômicos independentes da seguinte forma: baixa escolaridade - OR 4,357 (IC95% 1,087-17,47, p=0,038), isolamento social - OR 4,390 (IC95% 1,158-16,64, p=0,030) e desconhecimento sobre os benefícios da revascularização precoce - OR 4,396 (IC95% 1,652-11,69, p =0,003). A mortalidade e ECAM foram mais altas no grupo II. Conclusão: O desconhecimento do paciente e o baixo nível socioeconômico foram associados à apresentação tardia para a ICPP, com desfechos mais adversos.
Abstract Background: Patient unawareness about acute myocardial infarction, its complications and the benefits of early revascularization is a crucial point that determines the outcomes. Moreover, the relationship between socioeconomic factors and patient presentation to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has not been fully studied. Objectives: Our objective was to investigate whether or not patient unawareness and other socioeconomic factors impact patient presentation to PPCI. Methods: The study comprised 570 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) revascularized by PPCI. The patients were classified into two groups according to the total ischemia time (the time from STEMI symptom onset to balloon dilatation); group I: Patients with early presentation (1-12 hours). Group II: Patients with late presentation (>12-24 hours). Socioeconomic factors, clinical outcomes including mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were evaluated in each group. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There are different socioeconomic factors affecting patient presentation to PPCI. Multivariate regression analysis identified the independent socioeconomic predictors as following: low educational level - OR 4.357 (CI95% 1.087-17.47, p=0.038), social isolation - OR 4.390 (CI95% 1.158-16.64, p=0.030) and unawareness about the benefits of early revascularization - OR 4.396 (CI95% 1.652-11.69, p=0.003). Mortality and MACE were higher in group II. Conclusion: Patient unawareness and low socioeconomic status were associated with late presentation to PPCI with more adverse outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the first liver tumor worldwide. Therefore, it is a matter of debate whether surgical treatment or percutaneous treatment should be preferred for the treatment of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of our study was to compare the long-term outcome and the survival between surgically and percutaneously treated small hepatocellular carcinomas. A retrospective study was performed in the department of hepatology during a period of 2009-2012. The study included all patients carrying small hepatocellular carcinoma which were divided in: group 1 including patients who underwent surgical treatment, and group 2 including patients who underwent percutaneous treatment. Among the 63 patients who were diagnosed for hepatocellular carcinoma, 28 carried a small hepatocellular carcinoma with a mean age of 63 years and sex-ratio of 0.64. Etiology of cirrhosis was viral in 96% cases. Surgical treatment [hepatic resection] was performed in 54% cases while percutaneous treatment was proposed for 46%: radiofrequency ablation in 69% and alcoholic injection in 31%. No major complications for both surgical and percutaneous treatment occurred in our study. The corresponding 6 months and 1- year overall survival rates for the surgical resection group and the percutaneous treatment group were 100%, 100%, 20%, and 52%, respectively [p=0,04]. The disease free survival were not significantly different. Our results showed the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation treatments [radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection] in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma