Phase 1 dose escalation study of rigosertib by 2-, 4-, or 8-hour infusion twice-weekly in patients with advanced cancer.

CONTEXT: Rigosertib, a potent, multi-kinase inhibitor that selectively induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells and is non-toxic to normal cells, is being developed for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. AIMS: To determine the safety, doselimiting toxicities, and clinical activity of rigosertib administered by 2-, 4-, or 8-hour continuous IV infusion twice-a-week for 3 weeks out of a 4-week cycle in patients with advanced solid tumor or hematological malignancies; and to confirm the safety and tolerability of the recommended phase 2 dose (RPTD). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study in men and women ≥18 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An escalation phase optimized the duration of infusion (2, 4, or 8 hours) of 3200 mg rigosertib twice-a-week for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle; an expansion phase confirmed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: All data summaries were descriptive. PK parameters were estimated using compartmental analysis. RESULTS: 25 patients (16 male, 9 female, 26- 66 years, all Asian) were treated with rigosertib, 16 in the escalation phase; 9 in the expansion phase. MTD was determined to be 3200 mg as a 4-hour infusion and 2400 mg over 4 hours was declared to be the RPTD. Best response was stable disease in 5 of 14 evaluable patients, with a mean (range) of 90 (43-108) days. CONCLUSIONS: 2400 mg rigosertib as a 4-hour infusion was identified as the RPTD. Five patients achieved stable disease lasting 6-16 weeks.

Association of CYP3A5*3 polymorphism with development of acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: CYP3A5 was observed to be an important genetic contributor to inter individual differences in CYP3A-dependent drug metabolism in acute leukemic patients. Loss of CYP3A5 expression was mainly conferred by a single nucleotide polymorphism at 6986A>G (CYP3A5*3). We investigated the association between CYP3A5*3 polymorphism and acute leukemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eighty nine acute leukemia cases comprising of 145 acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), 144 acute myeloid leukemia and 241 control samples were analyzed for CYP3A5*3 polymorphism using PCR-RFLP method. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version (15.0) to detect the association between CYP3A5*3 polymorphism and acute leukemia. RESULTS: The CYP3A5*3 polymorphism 3/3 genotype was significantly associated with acute leukemia development (χ2- 133.53; df-2, P 0.000). When the data was analyzed with respect to clinical variables, mean WBC, blast % and LDH levels were increased in both ALL and AML cases with 3/3 genotype. The epidemiological variables did not contribute to the genotype risk to develop either AML or ALL. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism might confer the risk to develop ALL or AML emphasizing the significance of effective phase I detoxification in carcinogenesis. Association of the polymorphism with clinical variables indicate that the 3/3 genotype might also contribute to poorer survival of the patients.

Association of CYP1A1*2 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: The Cytochrome P-4501A1 (CYP1A1) gene, located on chromosome 15q, is involved in the metabolism of carcinogens mainly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as well as estrogen. It is considered as candidate gene for low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility. Hence the present study aims to discuss the role of CYP1A1 polymorphisms in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 250 breast cancer patients and the same number of healthy age-matched controls were analyzed for the polymorphism of CYP1A1*2 by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: In the present study, association of CYP1A1*2 (Ile 462Val) polymorphism with breast cancer was studied. Only one breast cancer patient was observed to be homozygous for Val allele but none among controls. The frequency of heterozygous Ile/Val genotype was found to be increased significantly in breast cancer patients (68.1%) as compared to controls (51.0%). Higher frequency of heterozygotes for Val allele was observed among premenopausal breast cancer patients and patients with high BMI, positive for HER2/neu status and advanced stage of the disease in comparison to the corresponding groups. No significant association of CYP1A1*2 polymorphism was observed with occupation, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status of breast cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results suggest a significant correlation between CYP1A1*2 expression and the occurrence of breast cancer.

PvuII polymorphism of estrogen receptor-α gene in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor (ER) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that mediates estrogen action in target tissue. Several common polymorphisms of the ERα gene have been reported to be associated with alterations in receptor expression in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-control study was designed to compare 250 breast cancer patients with 250 age-matched healthy controls. The frequency distribution of PvuII polymorphism in the ERα gene was assessed by PCR-RFLP method. RESULTS: The frequency of the PP genotype (35.3%) was increased significantly in breast cancer patients when compared to controls (19.8%), with a corresponding increase in P allele frequency (χ2= 16.4; P = 0.0003). The OR for genotypes PP vs. Pp was 1.989 (95% CI: 1.2708 to 3.113). Premenopausal women with breast cancer had an elevated frequency of the PP genotype (22.8%) as compared to postmenopausal women (16.8%). The frequency of the PP genotype was increased in patients positive for ER and HER-2/neu as compared to those with receptor-negative status. The pp and p allele frequencies were increased in progesterone-receptor-negative status. When stage of the disease was considered, both Pp and pp genotype frequencies were elevated in patients with advanced stage breast cancer. The frequency of the P allele and PP genotype frequencies tended to increase with increase in body mass index, whereas the Pp genotype frequency was elevated only in obese patients. The reverse was observed in the case of pp genotype frequency. CONCLUSION: The study thus highlighted the influence of ERα PvuII polymorphism on the development and progression of breast cancer.