Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
1.
Asian Journal of Andrology ; (6): 890-895, 2008.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-284730

ABSTRACT

<p><b>AIMS</b>To determine when a bone scan investigation is appropriate in asymptomatic men diagnosed with prostate cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Between November 2005 and July 2006, 317 men with prostate cancer underwent a bone scan study; 176 men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cut-offs as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses using digital rectal examination finding, biopsy Gleason scores and age were performed to determine when a bone scan study is likely to be of value.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Only 1/61 men (1.6%) with a serum PSA 20 ng/mL had a positive bone scan. However, 2/38 men (4.7%) with a serum PSA 20.1-40.0 ng/mL, 3/20 men (15%) with a serum PSA 40.1-60.0 ng/mL, 7/19 men (36.8%) with a serum PSA 60.1-100.0 ng/mL and 19/38 men (50%) with a serum PSA > 100.0 ng/mL had positive bone scans. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were uninformative in these groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Based on our findings, a bone scan is of limited value in asymptomatic prostate cancer patients presenting PSA =or< 20 ng/mL. Therefore, this investigation can be eliminated unless a curative treatment is contemplated. Furthermore, digital rectal examination finding, biopsy Gleason score and age are unhelpful in predicting those who might harbor bone metastasis.</p>


Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Analysis of Variance , Bone Neoplasms , Diagnostic Imaging , Bone and Bones , Diagnostic Imaging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms , Diagnostic Imaging , Pathology , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals , Retrospective Studies , Technetium Tc 99m Medronate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL