Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 1478-1482, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-976273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of polyisobutylene (PIB)-type Gutong plaster (called “PIB Gutong plaster” for short) versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis in Chinese adults. METHODS Based on a real-world study, after propensity score matching, the decrease in pain visual simulation score, utility increase, time to pain resolution, time to return to normal range of motion and total adverse events of PIB Gutong plaster versus three NSAIDs (celecoxib, diclofenac sodium, and ibuprofen) were evaluated. Cost-utility analysis was used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of patients using PIB Gutong plaster versus the three NSAIDs from the perspective of the whole society, and sensitivity analysis was carried out. RESULTS In terms of effectiveness, the recovery time of joint activity in PIB Gutong plaster group was significantly longer than that in celecoxib group, the decrease in VAS score of PIB Gutong plaster was significantly higher than that of ibuprofen but significantly lower than that of diclofenac sodium; the time of pain disappearance was longer than that in diclofenac sodium group and ibuprofen group, and the increase in health utility was significantly lower than that in diclofenac sodium group (P<0.05). In terms of safety, there were no significant differences in the incidence and severity of adverse events of PIB Gutong plaster, compared with the three NSAIDs, without statistical significance (P<0.05). In terms of cost-effectiveness, compared with celecoxib and diclofenac sodium, PIB Gutong plaster was dominant. Compared with ibuprofen, the ICER value of PIB Gutong plaster was 178 611.58 yuan/QALY, indicating that at the current price, PIB Gutong plaster was cost-effective if the threshold was 3 times GDP per capita. The results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with those of basic analysis. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of PIB Gutong plaster was better than that of ibuprofen, similar to that of celecoxib, but worse than that of diclofenac sodium, the safety was consistent with the three NSAIDs, and the cost-effectiveness of PIB Gutong plaster needs to be improved.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 1109-1114, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-923760

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the econo mical efficiency of Recombinant human thrombopoietin injection (called “rhTPO”for short )versus Etrapopa ethanolamine tablets (called“Etrapopa”for short )in the second-line treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)in the Chinese adult patients. METHODS Based on the decision tree-embedded Markov model with a 4-week cycle ,the cost and utility related to bleeding events and adverse events after the use of the two drugs were measured and compared from the perspective of Chinese health system. The horizon was 12 weeks,and the cost and health outcome were not discounted. RESULTS Compared with Etrapopa ,rhTPO improved the quality adjusted life year by 0.002 5 and reduced the cost by 1 824.36 yuan,which was the absolute advantage scheme. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the base results were greatly affected by the dosage of rhTPO and Etrapopa during maintainance period. In most cases ,rhTPO was economical. Probability sensitivity analysis showed that when willingness-to-pay threshold varied between 0 yuan and 250 000 yuan,the probability about that rhTPO was economical ranges from 99.90% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS Based on the available evidence ,rhTPO is more economical in the short term than Etrapopa in the second-line treatment of ITP.

3.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 2002-2007, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-886585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To review the method and results of pharmacoeconomic evaluation of aspirin for cardiovascular disease prevention ,and to provide reference for economic evaluation of aspirin and clinical medication decision. METHODS : Using“cardiovascular disease ”“cost-effectiveness”“cost-utility”“cost-benefit”“cost effectiveness ”“cost utility ”as the Chinese search terms ,using“cost-effectiveness”“cost-utility”“cost-benefit”“economic analysis ”“pharmacoeconomics”as English search terms,relevant literatures about pharmacoeconomic evaluation of aspirin for cardiovascular disease prevention published during January 1,2000 to January 17,2021 were retrieved from CNKI ,Wanfang database ,VIP,PubMed,Web of Science ,the Cochrane Library. After screening literatures according to inclusion and exclusion criteria ,extracting relevant data ,the quality of included literatures was evaluated with CHEERS scale. The method and results of pharmacoeconomic evaluation of aspirin in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases were analyzed statistically in terms of basic information ,literature quality ,model structure and elements ,health status and utility value ,cost items and sources ,health output ,economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS :Nine literatures were included ,and the total coincidence rates of the literatures were all above 80.00%. The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of aspirin in the prevention of cardiovascular disease mainly adopted Markov model , and the model structure was relatively mature. The cost mainly considered the direct cost ,and the data mainly came from the medical insurance database ;utility was calculated according to the utility value of health state ,which mostly came from the existing literatures. The sensitivity analysis adopted deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis ,and the main influential factor was cost. It was economical to use aspirin for cardiovascular disease prevention in most cases ,and aspirin was more economical for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. It is suggested that domestic scholars can refer to China ’s pharmacoeconomic guidelines to carry out relvant pharmacoeconomic evaluation research more standardized.

4.
Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics ; (12): 218-221, 2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-411259

ABSTRACT

The earthworm fibrinolytic enzymes (EFE) were separated by affinity ch romatography using soybean trypsin inhibitor as a matrix. The enzymes were furth er separated and purified into 12 components after DEAE-32 chromatography and p reparative electrophoresis. The pI of these components gradually decreased f rom pH 4.0 according to electrophoresis mobility from higher to lower on PAGE. The molecular weights were in the range of 22~34 ku. 6.5 and 7 w ere glycoproteins proved by staining with the shiff reagent and thymol/sulfuric acid. The fibrinolytic activity of 7 was highest as determined usi ng chromzym UK and chromzym PL as specific substrates.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL